Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for designing, running, and reporting computational experiments for academic journals. It teaches authors how to make performance claims scientifically defensible by addressing potential referee criticisms (e.g., tuning artifacts, seed luck). It covers advanced statistical techniques (performance profiles, nonparametric tests) and details the full structure required for a complete, verifiable GitHub data deposit.

This guide provides best practices for creating clear and legible computational exhibits for academic manuscripts, particularly for INFORMS journals. It covers advanced techniques like performance profiling, visualizing scaling behavior on log axes, and presenting stochastic results with full dispersion. The goal is to ensure that the presented figures and tables strongly support the computational claims while maintaining rigorous methodological standards and reproducibility.

This guide helps researchers determine if their Operations Research (OR) or analytics findings are sufficiently computation-first for submission to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It provides a rigorous scope test, focusing on computational/methodological advances, measurable performance claims, and reproducibility standards, ensuring authors select the correct technical area and venue.

This guide provides detailed instructions for authors on structuring the Related Work section for ACM IMC papers. It emphasizes that related work must cover not only prior claims but critically analyze prior datasets, vantage points, tools, and methodologies. It teaches techniques like delta-first positioning and proper venue attribution to demonstrate deep domain expertise and avoid common academic pitfalls.

This guide details the mandatory steps required after acceptance to prepare a paper for IEEE Xplore publication. It covers critical technical requirements, including full de-anonymization, adherence to the IEEEtran format and page limits, completing the electronic Copyright Form (eCF), passing PDF eXpress validation, and integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for authors to enhance the reproducibility of technical research papers (especially in networking and computer science). It covers documenting proofs, pinning simulation setups, reporting parameters, and best practices for releasing code and datasets, transforming a paper from a claim into a verifiable scientific artifact.

A comprehensive audit checklist for submitting papers to the INFOCOM conference. It covers critical compliance aspects, including the two-step abstract registration process, strict IEEEtran formatting rules (9-page body limit), mandatory double-blind anonymization, and adherence to author submission caps. Use this guide to ensure your manuscript meets all technical and procedural requirements before the deadline.

A comprehensive guide for revising technical papers submitted to top-tier networking conferences (like INFOCOM). It emphasizes structural rigor, defensive writing techniques, pairing every claim with proportional evidence, and adhering strictly to page limitations to proactively address reviewer objections before the rebuttal phase.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS). This skill helps authors strategically position their work by focusing on core themes like autonomous agents, multiagent learning, game-theoretic interaction, and decentralized decision-making. It covers submission framing, evidence requirements, and risk assessment to ensure manuscripts align with the venue's technical focus.

This guide helps authors targeting top-tier conferences on Constraint Programming (CP) to strategically position their manuscripts. It provides deep insights into the required scope, evidence bar, technical focus (e.g., propagation, optimization), and necessary re-framing techniques. Use this skill to enhance algorithmic clarity and ensure your work aligns precisely with the specialized community standards of the venue.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

This comprehensive guide details the end-to-end technical program committee (TPC) review process for major academic conferences like INTERSPEECH. It walks through every stage—from initial submission and area assignment to independent review, rebuttal, meta-review, and final decision. Users can learn how to decode reviewer feedback, understand the limitations of the rebuttal, and develop a strategic plan for future submissions and research refinement.