Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for technical writers revising manuscripts for top-tier robotics venues. It emphasizes shifting the paper's focus from system demonstrations to a primary, falsifiable scientific claim. Learn to structure your argument, size evidence to the claim scope, pre-answer reviewer critiques, maintain extreme concision, and report failures with scientific rigor.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing high-impact scientific figures for major academic journals. It covers technical aspects like optimal sizing, font legibility, and colorblind safety, while also enforcing strict data visualization practices (e.g., using dot plots over bars, defining 'n', ensuring data integrity). Use this as a final quality check before submission to guarantee scientific rigor and maximize publication chances.

A structured methodology for transforming highly technical, narrow scientific findings into a high-impact, broad narrative suitable for top-tier scientific journals. It guides authors to shift focus from mere background reporting (lab reports) to stating a generalized, surprising advance and its broad implications, ensuring the 'so what?' question is answered immediately.

This comprehensive guide provides a rigorous framework for scientific reporting, ensuring statistical integrity and full reproducibility. It instructs authors on essential elements like reporting effect sizes, justifying sample sizes, controlling for multiple comparisons, and distinguishing biological from technical replicates, helping manuscripts meet the high standards of top-tier scientific journals.

This skill helps researchers evaluate whether their manuscript aligns with the scope and practical orientation of specific academic journals. It provides structural advice, outlines key evidence requirements (e.g., patent quality, data analysis), identifies common rejection pitfalls, and guides the user through official submission checks for highly specialized journals.

This skill provides comprehensive guidelines for submitting manuscripts to the journal *Science of Science and Management of S&T*. It helps researchers assess the article's fit, structure, required evidence (e.g., patent quality, network analysis), and common pitfalls associated with technology policy and innovation systems research, ensuring academic rigor.

This skill is designed to help researchers assess the suitability and structure of their academic manuscripts for the journal 'Scientific Management Research.' It analyzes the alignment of the topic with core areas like innovation policy, technology management, and regional science. Users can utilize it to understand journal requirements, identify common rejection pitfalls, and receive suggestions for improving the narrative and scope before submission.

Provides a structured methodology for authors preparing a technical resubmission response, particularly for systems-level research. It emphasizes treating reviewer feedback as a contractual list of required changes, necessitating new measurements and concrete evidence rather than mere arguments. Users learn to create a critical 'change-map,' prioritize blocking concerns, and maintain professional anonymity during the resubmission process.

This comprehensive audit guide walks through the critical, multi-gate checks required for submitting academic papers to conferences like SenSys. It covers technical formatting rules (page limits, templates), administrative compliance (deadlines, author conflicts), and critically, advanced identity leak sweeping (hardware, deployment details) to ensure the paper is fully anonymous and compliant before final submission.

A comprehensive guide detailing the required structure and technical rigor for writing papers in sensing and embedded systems (SenSys). It mandates replacing vague adjectives with concrete, measured metrics (e.g., energy in joules, latency in milliseconds) and structuring the argument around a clear 'pain $\to$ gap $\to$ mechanism $\to$ measured behavior' arc on the first page. Essential for academic researchers and engineers.

A comprehensive guide for authors considering submission to SIAM Review. This skill evaluates whether a manuscript fits the journal's expository, broad-readership mandate for applied and computational mathematics. It outlines requirements for different sections (e.g., Survey, Research Spotlights), covering accessibility, technical rigor, structure, and official submission checklists.

A comprehensive guide for positioning academic papers in highly competitive technical fields, particularly networking and distributed systems. Learn how to systematically sweep major venues (SIGCOMM, NSDI, MobiCom, etc.), rigorously prove every prior work via dblp/ACM DL, and articulate clear novelty by distinguishing core mechanisms from mere engineering polish. Essential for top-tier conference submissions.