Skill UI

This guide provides expert knowledge on the history, etymology, and correct modern usage of the em dash (—). It covers various punctuation marks—including commas, semicolons, and colons—and offers specific guidelines on when to use them in professional writing, technical documentation, and code comments. It emphasizes adapting punctuation rules for different media types.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising top-tier systems papers, specifically for conferences like EuroSys. It details the required academic structure, including building the problem-to-mechanism arc, managing the 12-page technical budget, writing rigorous evaluation sections (including measuring failure cases), and maintaining the necessary double-blind academic voice.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic papers submitted to FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency). It instructs authors on how to frame socio-technical contributions to be legible to a mixed panel of computer scientists, lawyers, and social scientists. Focus areas include scoping claims to specific populations, explicitly arguing adverse impacts, and making interdisciplinary concepts native to the text.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting storage-related research to top-tier conferences (e.g., USENIX FAST). It dictates how to structure the paper, emphasizing leading with the specific storage cost addressed (e.g., write amplification, tail latency, endurance) and grounding all claims in proportional, real-device evidence rather than generic performance statements. Essential for ensuring technical rigor and reviewer trust.

This guide outlines the specific writing standards required for high-impact academic manuscripts in finance. It teaches authors how to structure their work to ensure the finding and its practical, managerial, or market implication ('the so-what') are immediately clear to a general finance audience, rather than being buried in technical jargon or methodology. Focus areas include finding-first abstracts and compelling first-page hooks.

A comprehensive guide detailing the best practices for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers, specifically tailored for top-tier conferences like FOCS. It emphasizes front-loading key results within the first ten pages, pairing informal statements with formal theorems, and calibrating prose for a broad, non-specialist committee.

This skill polishes scholarly prose for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations and social science. It focuses on elevating the writing from technically correct but flat drafts to a theoretically engaged, highly readable, and narratively compelling register. It guides users on structuring the argument (puzzle to generativity), refining prose (cutting nominalizations, using process voice), and adhering to strict academic constraints (abstract length, word caps, anonymity).

A comprehensive guide for crafting academic rebuttals in response to peer reviews (e.g., ICALP). It teaches authors how to strategically address correctness doubts, correct factual misreadings, provide necessary clarifications, and honestly concede genuine gaps, all while adhering to strict double-blind rules and limited word counts. The focus is strictly on technical precision, helping authors improve their paper's acceptance chances.

This guide provides structural best practices for writing highly technical academic papers, particularly for top-tier conferences. It teaches authors how to critically distinguish between the core material that must be visible in the main body (for the referee to follow and judge) and the auxiliary details, complete proofs, or routine calculations that can be safely deferred to an appendix. Following this structure prevents common writing pitfalls, such as 'hollow bodies,' ensuring the paper is both highly readable and technically rigorous.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting professional rebuttals to academic conference reviews, such as ICASSP. It emphasizes the critical difference between correcting factual errors and addressing legitimate gaps. The focus must be on providing a clean rationale for the technical committee's acceptance, adopting a professional tone suitable for a single-blind review process, and anchoring all claims to the submitted material.

This guide details the rigorous process of condensing highly technical papers, especially in signal processing, into extremely constrained formats (e.g., 4-page conference submissions). It teaches structure, emphasizing the immediate presentation of the core signal-processing contribution, the mechanism, and task-matched metrics on the first page, ensuring the argument survives review by deep subfield experts.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for top-tier computer vision conferences like ICCV. It instructs writers on structuring papers for a generalist reviewer pool, maintaining the 'inclusive 8-page economy,' adopting a mechanism-first exposition style, and formulating claims that withstand rigorous review and rebuttal cycles. Essential for elevating technical prose to a publishable standard.