Skill UI

This tool synthesizes multiple, scattered research findings retrieved from memory into a single, structured, and actionable report. It automatically grades evidence quality (High/Medium/Low), resolves conflicting claims, and provides concrete, recommendation-based insights, making complex data digestible for decision-making.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the AAMAS peer review process. It covers everything from initial submissions and technical evaluation (correctness, significance, rigor) to the rebuttal phase, area-chair synthesis, and final decisions. Use this when planning academic submissions or understanding the rigorous criteria for publishing multi-agent systems research.

This skill is a specialized tool designed for scholars to assess the suitability and scope of their academic review article against the rigorous standards of top-tier management journals, such as Academy of Management Annals (AMA). It helps determine if a manuscript is merely a summary, or if it possesses the necessary synthesis, new organizing framework, and credible future research agenda required for publication in a highly selective venue.

A comprehensive guide to modeling the entire academic review cycle for major NLP conferences like ACL. It details the stages from initial submission (ARR cycle intake) through peer review, author response, meta-review synthesis, commitment decision, and final venue decision (Main Conference, Findings, or Reject). It also outlines the roles of reviewers, area chairs, and program chairs, providing strategic advice for authors on navigating the complex publication landscape.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting high-impact materials research. It details how to select expert referees (covering synthesis, device, and application domains) and provides actionable strategies to pre-empt common reviewer objections—such as claims of incremental advance, insufficient characterization, or weak benchmarking—thereby strengthening the manuscript's overall rigor and maximizing publication success.

This skill guides researchers on how to triage numerous robustness checks for short-format academic manuscripts (e.g., AER: Insights) constrained by word and exhibit limits. It teaches the 'minimum credible set' approach: identifying the 1-2 core checks that defend the central hypothesis for the main text, while systematically moving all supplementary checks to the Appendix and properly signposting them in one sentence to maintain credibility.

This guide teaches users how to transform a collection of historical facts and sources into a sustained, contestable, and nuanced academic argument. It focuses on establishing a clear thesis, defining the stakes, building evidence chains, and proactively addressing counter-arguments, moving beyond mere description to provide genuine scholarly contribution.

A comprehensive guide for conducting rigorous academic literature reviews. It teaches authors how to critically appraise and synthesize conflicting empirical evidence by weighing findings based on credibility, study design, and contextual differences. The framework ensures balance, maintains objectivity, and elevates the quality of academic scholarship.

This framework provides a rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and comprehensive academic syntheses. It guides researchers through building transparent coverage, designing robust coding matrices, and choosing the correct integration method (narrative, systematic, or bibliometric) to move beyond simple summarization and create an auditable intellectual map of a field.

This guide teaches researchers how to construct credible, high-impact synthesis exhibits for academic reviews (e.g., Academy of Management Annals). It focuses on creating framework figures, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and coverage exhibits that summarize existing literature, rather than presenting new primary data estimates. Essential for systematically structuring and communicating complex knowledge fields.

This guide provides late-stage polishing for academic manuscripts, specifically targeting the Academy of Management Review (AMR) house style. It helps transform drafts that read like literature reviews or essays into tightly structured, argument-driven theoretical pieces. Key focus areas include establishing a clear theoretical puzzle in the introduction, maintaining continuous argumentative flow, ensuring precise definition of constructs, and articulating propositions without using hypothesis language. It is crucial for authors who need to refine their prose and structure before final subm...

This skill guides authors through evaluating the suitability of their clinical research manuscript for Annals of Internal Medicine. It provides deep insights into the journal's high standards, including specific methodological requirements (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD, TRIPOD), required evidence synthesis depth, ideal scope (RCTs, systematic reviews, guidelines), and current house style guidelines necessary for successful submission.