Skill UI

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It does not write the paper itself, but rather diagnoses the current stage of your research and guides you on the optimal next specialized skill to utilize. Whether you are defining your contribution, analyzing data, structuring proofs, or preparing a rebuttal letter, this guide ensures you follow the correct academic sequence from topic selection to final submission.

A comprehensive tool for authors aiming to submit high-significance, novel research to journals like Geology (GSA). It guides authors on compressing broad geoscientific findings into concise letters, ensuring the work meets strict standards for novelty, general significance, and adherence to specific journal house style and data deposition policies.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and improving the scientific rigor of hardware architectural evaluations (e.g., HPCA style). It emphasizes establishing a clear 'fidelity contract' defining tools, scope, and configurations. It requires that all performance claims are backed by credible instruments, mandates capturing full machine state provenance, ensuring honest baseline tuning, and reporting results via per-workload distributions rather than single means.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for submitting manuscripts to academic journals (e.g., Human Relations). It guides authors through critical pre-submission requirements, ensuring compliance with double-anonymity, strict word limits, SAGE Harvard citation style, structured abstracts, and mandatory declarations (AI use and data transparency). Use this tool to validate your manuscript before submission and minimize desk rejections.

This guide details best practices for achieving reproducibility in highly theoretical computer science papers, such as those submitted to ICALP. Since artifact evaluation is absent, reproducibility hinges on the ability for any reader to independently verify every step of the proof. Key requirements include writing self-contained proofs, providing verifiable computational certificates, maintaining consistency between submissions, and optionally using formal verification tools like Coq or Lean.

A comprehensive self-auditing guide designed for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to top-tier academic journals. It systematically addresses recurring, structural, and critical flaws across theory contribution, econometric identification, mechanism explanation, heterogeneity analysis, and writing conventions. This tool helps authors proactively identify and correct potential weaknesses before facing peer review.

This guide serves as a comprehensive project management tool for authors submitting to the IEEE ICSME conference. It provides backward-planning heuristics for the entire lifecycle, covering milestones from abstract registration through paper submission, author response, and final camera-ready artifact preparation, accounting for the single-annual-round structure.

A comprehensive tool designed to help authors assess the suitability and optimal framing of their manuscripts for the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE). It guides the structuring of contributions, required evidence (runnable artifacts, benchmarks), and positioning relative to core SE concepts like program analysis, testing, and AI-assisted development. Use this guide to strategize conference submissions and strengthen the academic narrative.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers position their work in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Spoken Language Understanding (SLU) for the IEEE ASRU workshop. It covers conference fit assessment, manuscript re-framing strategies, understanding venue-specific evidence requirements (e.g., decoding, robustness analysis), and differentiating the contribution from related fields like Interspeech or SLT. Use this tool for submission strategy and academic positioning.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the IEEE CASE conference. This tool helps assess manuscript fit by focusing on automation science, manufacturing, logistics, and cyber-physical systems. It guides authors on how to re-frame algorithmic designs with practical operational evidence, structure the contribution, and anticipate reviewer expectations for top-tier automation venues.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine the suitability and strategic framing for submitting manuscripts to the IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). It covers core scope alignment (reverse engineering, reengineering, code intelligence), required evidence standards (practical tools, benchmarks), and provides crucial guidelines for positioning the work relative to other top-tier CS venues.