Skill UI

This tool acts as an orchestrator for writing *Progress in Human Geography* manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire writing process by routing the piece based on its lifecycle stage, genre (Review Article vs. Progress Report), and whether the topic is truly review-worthy. It systematically ensures the resulting work is synthetic, critical, and focused on developing a core academic argument.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors considering submitting a large-scale, monograph-length review to Physics Reports. It covers journal positioning, required scope across all physics subfields, the rigorous evidence bar, house style, and submission checklist. Use this tool to help structure and refine an article intended to become a definitive, self-contained academic reference.

This skill guides authors on assessing the suitability of their general biology manuscript for PLOS Biology. It covers the journal's high standards for scientific rigor, data availability, mandatory reporting guidelines (e.g., ARRIVE, CONSORT), and the structure of a plain-language Author Summary. Use this tool for venue selection and optimizing your submission to maximize publication chances.

This guide helps authors determine if their manuscript is suitable for submission to Progress in Aerospace Sciences. It emphasizes that the journal requires comprehensive, critical review articles that synthesize existing knowledge, rather than presenting original primary research, simulations, or experiments. Use this tool for fit assessment, scope definition, and structural re-framing before submission.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to Psychological Science. It guides researchers through the complex publication process, making critical decisions based on the manuscript type (e.g., Research Article, Registered Report) and the current stage of development. It is crucial for managing constraints like tight word limits and rigorous open-science requirements, directing users to the correct specialized skills at every step.

This tool serves as an essential orchestrator for crafting and submitting research syntheses (such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews) for Psychological Bulletin. It guides users through the entire rigorous research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature searching (PRISMA) to data coding, meta-analysis, theoretical integration, and final manuscript preparation. It ensures that the project is correctly framed as a synthesis of existing work, not a primary study.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for developing Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire writing lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to theory building, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It helps users determine the most appropriate article type (e.g., Scholarly Take, Conceptualizing PA) and maps the necessary steps to ensure the work bridges both academic theory and practical public management relevance.

This tool guides authors writing on industrial organization, market structure, regulation, and antitrust. It provides a rigorous framework for evaluating whether a manuscript meets the high standards of top-tier IO journals by assessing theoretical models, empirical identification, and policy significance. Use it for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.

This skill is a comprehensive fit and re-framing tool for quantitative macroeconomists targeting top-tier dynamic economics journals like the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It provides a detailed checklist covering structural model requirements, data discipline (calibration/estimation), computational rigor, and adherence to specific house styles, helping authors assess their manuscript's suitability before submission.

This skill is a comprehensive fit and venue-selection tool designed for authors targeting top-tier finance journals, such as Review of Finance. It helps authors assess whether their manuscript meets the journal's rigorous standards across scope, methodology, evidence, and structure. Use it to re-frame your work, check for potential desk-reject risks, and identify suitable alternative elite-field venues before submission.

A specialized academic tool designed to help researchers evaluate whether their manuscript is suitable for submission to highly specialized journals, such as the China Review of Political Economy. It guides users on aligning empirical findings with deep theoretical construction, institutional analysis, and the specific theoretical framing of Marxist and Chinese socialist political economy.

This skill is a comprehensive guidance tool designed to help authors determine the suitability and required scope for submitting manuscripts to Reviews of Modern Physics (RMP). It outlines the journal's authoritative positioning, the necessary synthesis depth, expected structure (Colloquia vs. Reviews), and high academic bar, ensuring that submissions serve as definitive community references rather than primary research reports. Use this before submitting to check for conceptual fit and structural completeness.