Skill UI

This tool serves as an orchestrator for authors preparing submissions to Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theoretical formalization to study design, data analysis, and open science practices. It emphasizes structuring the contribution as a model-driven, multi-experiment program, ensuring all necessary steps, including code transparency, are addressed.

This skill acts as an academic positioning tool for targeting high-level journals focused on institutional and economic comparison, such as the Comparative Economic and Social Systems journal. It helps users assess if their manuscript possesses the necessary comparative scope, institutional logic, and generalizable theoretical contribution required for acceptance, guiding manuscript reframing and submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide helping authors position their research for the Conference on Learning Theory (COLT). It covers core topics like formal learning theory, statistical learning, optimization, and lower bounds. Use this tool to evaluate venue fit, structure the manuscript as 'theorem-first,' and adhere to specific academic conference submission standards.

This tool models the comprehensive, multi-stage academic review pipeline used by CoRL (Conference on Robot Learning). It simulates the entire double-anonymous review process, including reviewer assignment, initial first-round rejection gates, the critical author rebuttal window, and the multi-tiered decision-making hierarchy (Reviewers -> ACs -> SACs). It helps authors understand where their efforts have the highest leverage in influencing the paper's outcome.

This router guide is specifically designed for researchers writing manuscripts for Chinese Public Administration journals. It does not replace specialized skills but serves as a comprehensive diagnostic tool, guiding the user through the entire academic writing process—from initial topic selection and literature review, to methodology refinement, policy implication drafting, and handling reviewer rebuttals. It helps pinpoint the current bottleneck in the research pipeline.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a critical preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to major journals (e.g., SAGE Track). It ensures compliance with strict guidelines, covering anonymization, word count adherence, abstract structure, ORCID linking, and robust data availability statements. Use this tool to minimize the risk of desk rejection due to formatting or procedural errors.

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for Criminology manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial idea generation to final submission and rebuttal. It ensures the manuscript makes a theoretical or measurement contribution, rather than just reporting a correlation, by routing the user to the appropriate specialized skill based on the paper's stage and conceptual gap.

A specialized routing tool designed for academic researchers submitting manuscripts to top-tier Computer Science and AI conferences. It helps users navigate complex decision points, such as selecting the best venue (e.g., ICML vs NeurIPS), matching contribution types (theory, system, empirical study), and adhering to specific submission guidelines and review constraints.

This specialized tool guides users in drafting and refining academic abstracts for top-tier finance and economics journals, such as CTE. It enforces strict structural rules, including the five-sentence pattern, and mandates the inclusion of quantified findings, specific data sources (CSMAR, WIND, etc.), and clear mechanisms, while eliminating vague, boilerplate policy language.

This tool serves as the comprehensive orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to Demography (PAA). It guides authors through the entire population science publishing lifecycle. By assessing the manuscript's current stage (e.g., topic selection, research design, data analysis, rebuttal) and determining the appropriate article type (Research Article, Note, or Commentary), it routes the user to the next specialized skill or writing phase required for successful submission.

This comprehensive guide is a fit and re-framing tool for authors targeting Developmental Cell. It details the journal's high standards for mechanistic studies spanning developmental and cell biology. It emphasizes that advances must go beyond mere phenotypes, requiring rigorous molecular mechanisms, quantified live imaging data, and adherence to STAR Methods. Use this to assess if your work meets the required depth and scope.

A comprehensive planning tool for developmental psychology researchers designing studies that must support a claim of change. It systematically guides users through critical methodological issues, including addressing age vs. cohort confounds, planning for measurement invariance across ages, handling attrition, and properly justifying sample size for growth slopes. Essential for strengthening the pre-analysis plan of longitudinal and cross-sectional designs.