Skill UI

This skill centralizes and manages Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for marketing agencies. Users can create SOPs from templates, assign them to specific brands, track compliance against recent campaign executions, and maintain detailed version control. It ensures consistent quality and accountability across all operational areas, from paid media to SEO.

Audit an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed audit checklist for authors submitting to the AAMAS conference. It covers verifying the correct conference track, maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to strict formatting rules (e.g., page limits, supplementary zip caps), and identifying potential submission-blocking risks to ensure readiness before the deadline.

Plan an ACL paper across ACL Rolling Review cycles: choose a cycle against conference commitment windows, backward-plan from the ARR deadline, track review, response and meta-review timing, decide commitment, loop resubmissions, and reach camera-ready and ACL Anthology publication.

A comprehensive guide for structuring research artifacts (code, models, datasets, media) for ACM Multimedia conferences. It details the distinct requirements for anonymous review packages versus permanent public releases, offering guidelines on ethics, licensing, reproducibility, and track-specific documentation.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire end-to-end workflow for submitting and presenting at ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). It breaks down the complex process into distinct phases—from initial thematic scoping and track selection, through the OpenReview abstract submission, paper and supplement delivery, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready preparation, and final conference presentation. It provides actionable advice, risk mitigation strategies, and re-targeting options for both success and rejection.

This skill provides a comprehensive, end-to-end workflow guide for academic journal submissions, specifically tailored for Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It maps the entire publishing journey—from topic selection and research design to submission, review tracking, revision, and final publication—into a structured timeline. It helps authors manage complex decision points, adhere to strict deadlines (like the 6-month response window), and avoid common pitfalls, ensuring a systematic approach to high-stakes scholarly publishing.

This tool serves as the central entry point and orchestrator for drafting an American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. It guides authors through the complex academic publishing lifecycle by determining the paper's specific track (e.g., Regular Article, Synthesis, Registered Report) and its current developmental stage (e.g., Idea, Theory, Data Analysis). It does not draft content; rather, it routes the user to the most relevant sub-skill for the next step in the writing process.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic research tools and data into highly polished, reproducible, and reusable packages for the ASE Artifact Evaluation track. Learn how to meet the criteria for earning 'Artifacts Available' (DOI archiving) and 'Artifacts Reusable' badges, ensuring your work is durable and accessible to the wider research community.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to major academic journals (e.g., American Sociological Review) via platforms like Sage Track. This guide ensures authors meet all technical requirements, including proper anonymity masking, adherence to specific word and length counts, proper formatting (ASA Style Guide), and managing required separate title pages, thereby minimizing avoidable desk-rejects and submission errors.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to a 'revise-and-resubmit' invitation in academic publishing. It details the critical process of review triage, structuring the revised manuscript with tracked changes, and writing a formal response letter. It covers strategies for handling various types of reviewer criticism, ensuring the revision is substantive, respectful, and adheres to academic standards.

A comprehensive guide detailing the methodology for packaging, documenting, and staging research artifacts (including code, datasets, knowledge graphs, and demo systems) for CIKM conference submission. It covers best practices for licensing, provenance tracking, versioning, and transitioning artifacts from anonymous review status to citable public releases, ensuring reproducibility and adoptability.