Skill UI

This comprehensive skill helps authors evaluate the suitability of their finance manuscript for the Journal of Financial Economics (JFE). It details the journal's exceptionally high standards across scope (asset pricing, corporate finance), methodology (robust identification, causal claims), and structure. It serves as a critical pre-submission checklist, outlining what constitutes a top-tier contribution and warning about common desk-reject triggers for the top-tier finance academic community.

This comprehensive skill helps researchers determine if their academic paper, focusing on banking, liquidity, or financial intermediation, is suitable for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI). It guides authors on necessary theoretical contributions, rigorous empirical identification methods (e.g., DiD/IV/RDD), required paper structure, and adherence to the journal's highly specific submission standards and potential rejection triggers.

This guide helps authors determine if their research, particularly in market microstructure, liquidity, or high-frequency trading, is suitable for the Journal of Financial Markets (JFM). It provides detailed heuristics on topic fit, required evidence, structural guidelines, and common rejection triggers, ensuring submissions are optimally framed for specialist financial economics venues.

This comprehensive skill guides researchers through assessing whether their operations and supply chain manuscript meets the rigorous standards of the Journal of Operations Management (JOM). It covers key areas including theoretical framing, empirical rigor (e.g., common-method bias, identification), structural best practices, and common desk-reject triggers, helping authors refine their work for high-impact academic publishing.

A comprehensive guide for researchers targeting Nature Astronomy. This skill helps authors frame their astrophysical or cosmological findings to meet the journal's high standards, emphasizing broad conceptual significance over narrow sub-field advancements. It covers scope fit, structural requirements (e.g., narrative flow, abstract writing), statistical rigor, and common pitfalls like desk-reject triggers, ensuring submissions appeal to a wide, expert audience.

A detailed guide for authors submitting review essays to highly selective journals, outlining the double-anonymous review model. It teaches authors how to anticipate expert critiques—moving beyond simple summaries to demonstrate critical intervention, conceptual clarity, and forward contribution. Covers desk-reject triggers and best practices for pre-submission stress-testing.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final stages of submitting a manuscript to Physical Review Letters (PRL). It verifies critical elements including LaTeX formatting (REVTeX), article type, required supplemental material, detailed metadata, author compliance, and adherence to APS guidelines. Use this checklist as the ultimate gate before final submission to prevent common desk-return triggers.

A comprehensive guide designed to help authors position, frame, and refine academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier accounting journals like The Accounting Review (TAR). It assesses method rigor, theoretical contribution, scope fit, and common desk-reject triggers across archival, experimental, and analytical designs.

This script automates the Git push process, ensuring safety checks (e.g., preventing direct pushes to main branches) and verifying uncommitted changes. Upon successful push, it dynamically generates and displays direct tracking links for CI pipelines on major platforms like GitLab and GitHub Actions, providing immediate status updates for development teams.

This specialized skill is designed to analyze complex security flaws involving forced authentication (coercion) and identity relay chains. It guides users to trace and document the complete, minimal path from the initial coercion trigger (e.g., a specific service or protocol edge) through intermediate hops, to the final service that accepts the relayed credentials. Use this for deep security research, forensics, and documenting the decisive sequence leading to privilege escalation or code execution.

This tool audits all existing skills within the current project. It performs a comprehensive quality check, validating frontmatter completeness, tool scoping, and content quality against established standards. It produces a detailed, scored report, including effort-level recommendations for each skill. Ideal for new project onboarding, pre-release quality assurance, or diagnosing skill triggering issues.

Performs comprehensive, two-layer validation on generated plans. Layer 1 executes instant structural checks (format, dependencies, compliance) while Layer 2 triggers specialist agents (e.g., security, DB, performance) based on plan content. The system forces resolution of all identified issues before allowing execution, supporting auto-fixes and guided human input.