Skill UI

A guide for academic authors on structuring the literature review section for top-tier accounting journals. It emphasizes moving beyond simple 'gap-spotting' and instead focuses on 'problematization'—identifying and resolving core tensions or unexplained results within existing scholarly debates. This skill helps frame the contribution by positioning the research within a live, ongoing academic conversation.

A specialized guide for researchers targeting the journal Taxation Research. It helps users vet their manuscripts for alignment with the journal's scope, structure, and academic expectations. The skill covers core themes such as tax reform, digital taxation, and international tax, while providing detailed advice on abstract writing, citation styles, methodology strength, and avoiding common rejection pitfalls.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on submitting manuscripts to The Journal of Roman Studies (JRS). It outlines JRS's core expectation: an original argument built directly on primary evidence (inscriptions, texts, artifacts, etc.). It covers disciplinary standards for Roman history, archaeology, epigraphy, and literature, ensuring submissions are appropriately framed and methodologically sound before actual submission.

This skill processes unstructured, rambling, stream-of-consciousness input (like dictation or brainstorming) into a highly structured 'echo' audit. It captures the user's core mission, locked decisions, open questions, and all model inferences, ensuring the user verifies the model's belief, not just the stated doubts. Ideal for refining fuzzy ideas before committing to work.

This comprehensive guide is designed to help authors assess the methodological and theoretical suitability of their manuscript for Transportation Research Part B. It emphasizes that the core contribution must be a generalizable method, model, or theorem (e.g., in traffic flow, network optimization, or choice modeling), rather than a simple applied case study. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and ensuring rigorous analytical justification.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate conference (UAI, AISTATS, NeurIPS, ICML, etc.) for their work, particularly when the core contribution revolves around uncertainty representation, probabilistic reasoning, or causal inference. It provides detailed filters and comparison points to refine the paper's scope and target audience.

A specialized guide for authors aiming to submit to the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI). It provides expert advice on framing the core contribution—such as probabilistic reasoning, causal inference, and uncertainty modeling—and calibrating the manuscript for highly technical, statistical ML reviewers. Use this skill to refine your submission strategy, identify evidence gaps, and properly position your work relative to other top-tier AI venues like AISTATS and IJCAI.

A comprehensive guide for optimizing computer science manuscripts targeting the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC). It covers core systems research fields (OS, networking, storage, security), defining the required evidence bar (built artifacts, clean evaluation), and re-framing the paper's contribution to align with top-tier systems venue expectations.

A comprehensive guide for positioning computer science manuscripts for top-tier security conferences like USENIX Security. It covers core topics (systems, network, privacy, software security), required evidence (rigorous artifact, measurement, vulnerability analysis), and strategic advice on framing the work to meet adversarial reviewer expectations. Ideal for authors preparing high-stakes academic submissions.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting the USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI). It helps in positioning complex systems research, covering core scope areas like operating systems, distributed systems, and cloud infrastructure. It details how to frame the contribution, build evidence (artifacts, baselines), and distinguish the work from similar top-tier venues like SOSP and NSDI.

This guide outlines the strict formatting and structural guidelines for submitting security conference papers (like USENIX Security). It helps authors determine which material—core mechanisms, proofs, or supplementary data—must remain in the main body to guarantee review visibility, versus what can be safely demoted to optional appendices or external artifacts.

This detailed guide helps researchers determine the optimal top-tier venue (e.g., USENIX Security, IEEE S&P, ACM CCS) for their security research paper. It emphasizes that venue selection must be based on the committee's core expertise and the existence of reusable artifacts, measurements, or systems evidence, ensuring the work has the necessary technical depth to succeed.