Skill UI

This comprehensive skill assists authors in evaluating the suitability and optimal framing of their computer science manuscript for the International Conference on Discovery Science. It provides deep, venue-specific guidance on required evidence, scope vocabulary (e.g., automated discovery, explainable patterns), and structural adjustments needed to emphasize the scientific discovery process, rather than just predictive results. Essential for optimizing high-level conference submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide for structuring environmental economics manuscripts, specifically tailored for high-impact journals. It teaches authors how to maintain a 'welfare-economics prose' standard, ensuring the crucial link between the environmental problem, the economic mechanism, and the policy implication is clearly and authoritatively presented. This prevents the paper from sounding like advocacy while retaining scientific rigor.

This guide helps writers structure academic syntheses to maintain rigorous objectivity, ensuring that the work summarizes the full spectrum of competing views rather than advocating for a single position. It details how to properly 'steelman' opposing arguments, weigh evidence impartially, separate positive findings from normative policy judgment, and honestly disclose areas of uncertainty.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major/minor revisions, reject-and-resubmits, or transfer offers from top-tier international finance journals (JIMF). It teaches the structured, evidence-based approach necessary to address reviewer critiques, reconcile conflicting feedback, and successfully advocate for revised methodology.

A specialized guide for refining scholarly manuscripts intended for public policy and marketing journals. It teaches how to structure the introduction around the concrete policy problem, write an actionable 200-word abstract, and maintain a tone of evidence rather than advocacy. The goal is to ensure the prose is clear and highly readable for both academic experts and non-technical policy practitioners.

This guide teaches rigorous conceptual analysis essential for analytic philosophy. It helps users define key terms precisely, draw clear distinctions between similar concepts, identify logical fallacies (like equivocation), and select the most appropriate philosophical method (e.g., conceptual analysis, thought experiments, formal modeling). Use it when an argument requires heightened precision and structural integrity.

This tool guides the accurate invocation of the `ov skills` command group for managing the entire skill lifecycle on OpenViking. It supports adding skills from local directories, Git repositories, or GitHub URLs, and provides commands for listing, searching, updating, removing, and validating skill formats. Use it when an agent needs to automate skill deployment or discover available capabilities.

A structured framework designed for authors writing comprehensive psychological reviews or theoretical statements. It guides users to transform a collection of research papers into a single, cohesive, and provocative argument by imposing a unifying structure—such as a taxonomy, theoretical model, or question sequence—that defines the field's central claim.

This guide helps researchers determine if their academic idea is suitable for publication in Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS). It evaluates contributions against four critical criteria—Breadth, Integration, Provocation, and Tractability—ensuring the topic is a superordinate, theoretical, or meta-scientific argument, rather than a single empirical study. It helps refine the animating question and select the correct journal venue.

This guide helps polish and restructure academic manuscripts intended as 'perspectives.' It moves writing beyond simple summary by emphasizing a broad, provocative, and highly accessible voice for non-specialists. It ensures the article follows a specific narrative arc: framing the question, stating the claim early, maintaining signposting, and concluding with a concrete, future-facing agenda.

A comprehensive guide for designing and documenting systematic literature searches for meta-analyses or systematic reviews. It ensures reproducibility by covering multiple databases (e.g., PsycINFO, PubMed), controlled vocabulary, grey literature, and adhering strictly to PRISMA-S guidelines. It helps build a robust, traceable research pool.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to publish in top-tier Information Retrieval (IR) conferences like SIGIR. It teaches the specific, quantitative 'native register' required, moving beyond general machine learning boilerplate. Covers structuring the first page arc, calibrating vocabulary, and building table-centric arguments under strict page limits.