Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission review for manuscripts targeting Cell Reports Medicine. It assesses the manuscript's fit regarding scope (translational and clinical research with mechanistic depth), evidence bar (requiring strong validation and causality), and house style. It helps authors determine if their work aligns with the journal's requirements before official submission.

This skill guides the design of real-data validation for academic manuscripts, specifically for forecasting and financial engineering strands. It covers data provenance, rolling out-of-sample tests, benchmark batteries, and statistical significance of improvements. It ensures robustness against look-ahead bias and parameter sensitivity, helping authors meet rigorous external review standards for empirical studies in journals like Chinese Journal of Management Science.

This comprehensive workflow guides researchers through the entire academic publication lifecycle for submissions to the Chinese Journal of Management Science. It acts as a critical router, ensuring manuscripts cover essential stages: topic selection, advanced model formulation, algorithm design, empirical validation (out-of-sample testing), and generating actionable managerial insights. It helps prevent common pitfalls like lacking empirical depth or misaligning with the journal's core focus on applied modeling.

This detailed guide helps authors assess the scientific rigor and scope fit for manuscripts targeting Composites Part B: Engineering. It covers advanced domains like composite mechanics, manufacturing processes, multiscale modeling, and multifunctional materials. It emphasizes that a strong contribution must demonstrate a clear, mechanism-driven advance from material science to structural application, supported by rigorous, quantitative experimental evidence and model validation.

This central routing skill guides authors through the complex process of journal selection for engineering and technology manuscripts. It does not replace a single journal submission but first classifies the content based on the engineering sub-discipline, contribution type (e.g., method, system, device), validation shape (e.g., simulation, field experiment), and intended audience breadth. It then routes the paper to the most specialized and appropriate journal skill for accurate re-framing and submission.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine the suitability and necessary framing for research related to environmental contamination. It mandates moving beyond simple pollutant detection, requiring rigorous evidence to connect contaminants to their fate, transport, and demonstrable ecological or human health impact. Essential for method validation, QA/QC, and scientific rigor.

This guide helps authors assess whether their computer security manuscript is suitable for the European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS). It covers conference positioning, necessary evidence standards (e.g., threat models, empirical validation), and scope definition across privacy, systems, and cryptography, ensuring the paper meets the high academic bar of the venue.

This skill provides a comprehensive fit and structural review tool for manuscripts targeting 'Field Crops Research.' It assesses whether an agronomy or crop-physiology paper meets the journal's high standard: rigorous, adequately replicated, multi-environment field experimentation. It guides authors on key topics like resource-use efficiency, crop modeling validation, and required methodological depth (e.g., mixed models, full metadata reporting).

This comprehensive guide outlines the high standards and scope required for publishing in Food Chemistry. It emphasizes rigorous analytical chemistry, detailed method validation (LOD/LOQ, precision), quantified compositional results, and strong chemical mechanism interpretation. Use this tool to assess whether your manuscript meets the necessary scientific rigor for this specialized journal.

This guide details best practices for submitting research artifacts to academic conferences, following the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme. It covers everything from required packaging plans (Docker, README, data provenance) to achieving various levels of validation (Functional, Reusable, Reproduced). Learn how to structure your submission to ensure maximum reproducibility and pass rigorous evaluator checks on a clean machine.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for safely upgrading GitHub Actions workflows and dependencies. Use this when encountering runtime deprecation warnings (e.g., Node.js or Python migrations). It outlines best practices, such as upgrading one action at a time and pinning releases using immutable commit SHAs, ensuring workflow behavior remains unchanged during modernization and validation.

A comprehensive guide for transforming an accepted academic conference paper into its final, publishable "camera-ready" format for IEEE Xplore. Covers mandatory steps like PDF eXpress validation, completing the electronic copyright form, integrating reviewer feedback, confirming metadata, and preparing for both physical presentation and open-access publication.