Skill UI

A comprehensive guide to achieving compliance with the HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR Part 164). This skill outlines the mandatory steps to protect electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI), including conducting thorough risk analyses, deploying administrative, physical, and technical safeguards, managing Business Associate Agreements (BAAs), and preparing for breach notifications and OCR audits. Essential for Covered Entities and Business Associates.

A comprehensive red-teaming technique for Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS). This skill utilizes the Certipy toolkit to enumerate and exploit various Certificate Service Configuration (ESC1-ESC16) misconfigurations over LDAP/RPC. It enables attackers to forge privileged certificates and perform PKINIT authentication, escalating a low-level domain foothold to Domain Admin or Domain Controller access during authorized penetration tests.

A comprehensive, professional single-page dashboard template designed for administration and analytics. It features a fixed sidebar, top navigation bar, KPI card grid, and dedicated space for 1-2 main charts (line, bar, area). It is ideal for operational monitoring, business reporting, and visualizing key performance indicators.

This skill provides a rigorous framework for assessing whether a scholarly manuscript meets the exceptionally high theoretical and conceptual standards of Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It guides authors on identifying the core theoretical contribution, evaluating the required research craft (qualitative or quantitative), and restructuring the paper to align with the sociology of organizations discourse, moving beyond mere empirical findings.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the developmental, multi-round review process at Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It explains decision types, reviewer roles, what to expect in each revision round, and how to strategically interpret complex decision letters to improve manuscript quality and submission strategy.

This tool acts as a diagnostic router for writing manuscripts intended for the Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It does not write the content but guides the user through the entire research and publication cycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through methodology, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill to focus on.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting the *China Public Administration Review*. It details the journal's academic scope, preferred research topics (e.g., governance, policy reform, digital government), required methodology, structural format, and common submission pitfalls. It helps users refine their manuscript to meet the high academic standards of a CSSCI-level journal.

A comprehensive guide and positioning tool for submitting manuscripts to top-tier Chinese public administration journals. It helps researchers assess if their work aligns with the journal's focus on governance modernization, policy execution, and government reform. The tool provides structural checklists, identifies common rejection risks, and suggests alternative journals for optimal submission.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for conducting heterogeneity and conditionality analysis in Chinese Public Administration (CPA) research. It outlines theory-guided methods for selecting dimensions (e.g., administrative level, governance context, institutional structure) and details best practices for both quantitative (Chow test, interaction terms) and qualitative (QCA) comparison, ensuring findings are theoretically grounded and methodologically rigorous.

This tool guides researchers in selecting and rigorously stress-testing appropriate methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, or normative) for public administration manuscripts. It ensures methodological alignment with the core research question, providing detailed checks for causal inference techniques (DID, IV, RDD) and qualitative rigor, thereby strengthening the overall academic argument.

Provides a detailed structural guide for writing high-quality literature reviews, specifically tailored for top-tier journals in Public Administration. It coaches users on transitioning from a simple 'listing' format to a critical 'dialogue' format, ensuring proper theoretical anchoring (e.g., Public Administration theory), balancing international and local literature, and clearly defining the paper's unique contribution and knowledge gaps.

This comprehensive guide provides a rigorous framework for identifying and testing the causal mechanisms underlying public administration outcomes. It moves beyond merely stating an effect, guiding researchers to detail the specific processes—such as policy execution, attention allocation, or central-local relations—that cause the observed outcome. It covers both quantitative mediation analysis (e.g., causal inference frameworks) and qualitative process evidence gathering, ensuring theoretical grounding and causal rigor in academic manuscripts.