Skill UI

The Unified Memory system provides a durable, inspectable context layer for sharing state and handoffs between multiple autonomous agents (harnesses) like Claude, Codex, and Hermes. It allows agents to save work state, transfer context, resume tasks, and search shared project knowledge across different scopes (project, team, user).

A comprehensive guide detailing the process of responding to major or minor revisions from academic journals (like AAAG). It teaches authors how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, address editor and referee concerns methodically, strengthen the core academic argument, and incorporate required methodological and cartographic fixes, ensuring the response is both respectful and scientifically rigorous.

A comprehensive guide detailing the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAAG) review process. It covers double-anonymous peer review, subject editor criteria, common pitfalls (such as lack of theory or poor cartography), and how to interpret decision letters to maximize acceptance chances. Use this before submission to stress-test your manuscript and improve scholarly rigor.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). This guide ensures manuscripts meet the strict standards for double-anonymity, word count caps (e.g., 11,000 words), Chicago style formatting, and proper handling of sensitive geographic data before submission via ScholarOne.

A comprehensive set of guidelines for generating maps, figures, and tables for academic journals. This guide emphasizes cartographic standards, statistical rigor, and maximizing the visual argument, ensuring that all exhibits are reproducible, legible in print, and adhere to strict word count limitations. It covers everything from projection choice and data normalization to model plot interpretation and handling spatial uncertainty.

This guide teaches researchers how to rigorously assess a topic's geographic significance and determine its optimal fit within the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). It implements a two-part fit test—ensuring the argument is fundamentally geographic (space/place/scale are load-bearing) and possesses sufficient reach to interest neighboring subfields. It guides authors in choosing the correct area (e.g., Human, Physical, Methods) and appropriate journal venue (Annals vs. specialty). Use this when defining a project scope, overcoming reviewer critiques, or deciding wher...

A comprehensive guide for preparing scholarly manuscripts involving spatial data. It outlines best practices for documenting data provenance (sources, projections, processing chains), ensuring reproducibility, and adhering to critical ethical standards such as geoprivacy and human-subjects protection. Essential for maintaining research integrity in academic publishing.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to the Annals of the AAG. It guides authors through the complex submission process by helping define the appropriate academic area (e.g., Human Geography, Physical Geography), the article format (Article, Commentary), and the sequential developmental stages—from topic selection and theory building to data analysis and final submission. It ensures the work is framed legitimately as *geography*.

This guide assists in polishing and formatting academic manuscripts for high-level geographical journals. It ensures adherence to specific academic standards, such as the Chicago Manual of Style (author-date), managing strict word count caps, and structuring the argument to be legible to a broad, interdisciplinary audience. It focuses on elevating prose from subfield jargon to broadly readable academic discourse.

This skill provides authors with a comprehensive guide to positioning their computer science manuscript for the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES). It covers critical aspects such as framing the contribution, meeting evidence standards, addressing social impacts, and distinguishing the work from similar venues like FAccT. Use it to refine submissions focused on AI ethics, governance, and socio-technical methods.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.