Skill UI

A comprehensive framework for conducting rigorous empirical data analysis required for top-tier academic journals. It guides users through building transparent archival samples, specifying appropriate panel data estimators (like firm/year fixed effects), ensuring correct standard error clustering, and executing sophisticated identification strategies (e.g., Difference-in-Differences, Instrumental Variables). Essential for addressing endogeneity and passing deep reviewer scrutiny.

A comprehensive methodological guide detailing how to design rigorous, publishable empirical or analytical studies for top-tier accounting and economics journals (like JAE). It focuses heavily on achieving causal identification by mastering techniques such as Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity (RDD), and event studies, ensuring the study design credibly supports the economic prediction.

A comprehensive guide for authors revising manuscripts for the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It details how to structure the point-by-point response letter, emphasizing the critical need to address the editor's concerns and incorporate robust empirical evidence (identification, mechanism, and alternative tests) to satisfy economics-trained reviewers.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a point-by-point rebuttal letter after receiving a major revision decision from a top-tier academic journal. It emphasizes strategic communication, prioritizing the Senior Editor's concerns, addressing technical issues in the appropriate disciplinary 'currency,' and maintaining a developmental, professional tone to maximize the chances of acceptance.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers evaluate whether a clinical or health-services study is appropriate for publication in JAMA Internal Medicine. It details the journal's high bar for methodological rigor, including requirements for randomized trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), and systematic reviews (PRISMA). It covers everything from study design and statistical reporting to addressing potential desk-reject triggers, ensuring authors submit high-quality, impactful research.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors submitting clinical, translational, or epidemiological oncology studies to JAMA Oncology. It covers venue fit assessment, required methodological rigor (e.g., RCTs, RWE, biomarker validation), mandatory reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), and adherence to the journal's specific house style and submission checklist. It is a crucial pre-submission aid, ensuring the research addresses a clinically meaningful, decision-relevant question.

This guide provides a rigorous, step-by-step framework for authors responding to major journal critiques, such as those received after a JAMA revision decision. It emphasizes maintaining scientific integrity by structuring point-by-point replies, accurately citing revisions, and addressing statistical and methodological concerns without fabricating new findings or overstating results.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors responding to a high-stakes 'Revise and Resubmit' (R&R) decision from an International Organization (IO) journal. It details how to structure the rebuttal memo, address conflicting expert reviews (e.g., rationalist vs. constructivist), and defend the manuscript's core theoretical contribution while maintaining academic transparency and verifiability.

This tool acts as a workflow router for preparing clinical manuscripts for high-impact journals like JAMA. It does not replace specialized writing or analysis skills but guides the user through the correct, sequential stages—from initial scope assessment to final submission and revision—ensuring all necessary standards (e.g., EQUATOR, CONSORT) are addressed in the proper order.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and validating empirical research designs (Survey/SEM, Secondary Data, Experiments, Meta-analysis) intended for high-impact journals. It addresses critical methodological issues such as construct validity, endogeneity control, robust identification strategies, and ensuring overall rigor across diverse academic genres.

A comprehensive guide for authors on planning and drafting a detailed, anonymous, point-by-point rebuttal letter for major journal revisions (e.g., JAMS R&R). It emphasizes strategically addressing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both theoretical and managerial contributions, and maintaining academic rigor across multiple review rounds.

A comprehensive guide for stress-testing and defending empirical identification strategies in finance and economics manuscripts. It covers advanced econometric techniques such as Staggered DiD, Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and Event Studies, providing actionable advice on fixed effects, clustering, necessary robustness checks, and anticipating referee challenges.