Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive, year-round workflow guide for submitting research papers to the CoRL Conference on Robot Learning. It meticulously breaks down the annual cycle into manageable phases—including pre-submission preparation, managing reviewer feedback, crafting rebuttals, and preparing camera-ready versions. It assists teams in planning their efforts across critical milestones and navigating the academic publishing process.

This comprehensive style guide is written for authors submitting research papers to the CoRL conference. It provides specific directives on structuring the narrative to satisfy two distinct audiences: machine learning theorists and robotics engineers. It emphasizes quantifying all claims with concrete evidence scales (e.g., success rates, frequency), structuring the argument within a limited page count, and properly integrating mandatory sections like Limitations.

A comprehensive guide for hardening deep learning papers, particularly in Computer Vision (CVPR). It details best practices for achieving rigorous reproducibility by utilizing the Compute Reporting Form (CRF), maintaining a detailed recipe ledger, ensuring benchmark split hygiene, and meticulously documenting all training hyperparameters, seeds, and variance analyses for academic publication.

This guide provides best practices for authors writing the Related Work section for top-tier AI conferences (e.g., ECAI). It instructs users on how to cover diverse AI lanes (symbolic, learning, multi-agent, application) for broad reviewers, employ 'Delta-first' positioning to state novelty concisely, and adhere to strict page budgets and double-blind review rules.

A comprehensive guide for advanced econometric techniques in causal inference, covering modern approaches for quasi-experimental designs such as staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and Double Machine Learning (DML). It details best practices, critical diagnostic tests (e.g., weak instruments, parallel trend checks, bias decomposition), and robust reporting standards required for high-impact economic research.

This skill provides a strategic guide for authors evaluating if their AI/data mining manuscript is a suitable fit for the ECML PKDD conference. It covers scope definition, evidence requirements, academic framing, and strategic positioning relative to major global venues (e.g., ICML, NeurIPS). Use this to refine your submission narrative and maximize your chances of acceptance.

This guide provides an in-depth framework for assessing the foundational significance of theoretical computer science results. It details the rigorous criteria used by top-tier conferences like FOCS (Foundations of Computer Science) to judge a paper's impact, focusing on its consequence, how it overcomes known obstacles, and its durability beyond best constants. It also maps various research types (e.g., cryptographic, algorithmic, learning theory) to the most suitable venue (e.g., FOCS, STOC, SODA, CCC).

This guide details the best practices for packaging, documenting, and releasing research artifacts (code, models, data) for top-tier ML conferences. It covers two stages: preparing a non-identifiable archive for anonymous review, and managing the public release runway, focusing on reproducibility, licensing, and sustained maintenance.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers detailing how to achieve and disclose full reproducibility for Computer Vision and deep learning models. Covers essential practices such as protocol pinning for foundation models, detailed logging of datasets, hardware specifications, and variance honesty, ensuring results remain verifiable years after publication.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors detailing how to establish and maintain rigorous reproducibility in Machine Learning research papers (e.g., ICLR). It instructs on mapping every central claim to verifiable evidence, including recording seeds, variance, specific compute budgets (training vs. inference), data preprocessing scripts, and ethical considerations. The statement must function as a public contract for the scientific community.

This guide assists researchers in determining the optimal venue for their theoretical machine learning contributions. It provides a framework for evaluating whether a result is best suited for COLT, or if it belongs in other top-tier conferences (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML) or journals (e.g., JMLR). It emphasizes differentiating between rigorous mathematical proofs (bounds, separations) and purely empirical findings.

This guide helps researchers determine if their Machine Learning project is suitable for ICLR, or if a different top-tier conference (such as NeurIPS, ICML, or CVPR) is a better fit. It emphasizes the need for deep representation-learning insights, mechanistic understanding, and theoretical contributions over mere application performance.