Skill UI

This tool provides a comprehensive and safe mechanism to remove a git worktree. It includes multiple safety checks, such as verifying if the branch is protected, checking for uncommitted changes, and confirming merge status. Furthermore, it guides the user through the entire cleanup process, including deleting local and remote branches, pruning references, and reminding about associated database cleanup.

Guides users to select a local, on-device Personally Identifiable Information (PII) detection model from a committed registry. It filters models based on language, required runtime environment (e.g., PyTorch, MLX), and size constraints. The process emphasizes building an offline shortlist and mandates rigorous pre-deployment recall validation and performance benchmarking to ensure secure, privacy-preserving deployment.

This tool automatically generates comprehensive release notes from git commits. It analyzes version history, categorizes changes (features, fixes, etc.), and outputs three distinct formats: a technical CHANGELOG.md section, a semi-technical PR body, and a user-friendly Slack announcement. It excels at transforming complex technical jargon into accessible messaging for different audiences.

This tool performs a rapid, heuristic security assessment focused on identifying common vulnerabilities listed in the OWASP Top 10. It scans source code for hardcoded secrets, SQL injection risks, XSS vectors, insecure dependencies, and authentication flaws. It is ideal for pre-commit checks or code reviews before merging sensitive changes.

This orchestrator manages the entire end-to-end pipeline for preparing technical talks, transforming raw materials—whether code commits (REX mode) or conceptual articles—into polished revision sheets. It sequentially runs through multiple stages (Research, Concepts, Scripting, Revision) with human-in-the-loop checkpoints, ensuring a structured and comprehensive content creation workflow.

This methodology provides a comprehensive framework for estimating buffered numbers—such as capacity limits, timeframes, or budgets—when making commitments under uncertainty. It guides users to calculate a buffer based on both residual estimation error and the potential cost of failure (breach cost), ensuring resilience against costly underestimation in critical systems or plans.

A rigorous decision-making methodology that quantifies the trade-offs when allocating scarce resources (time, budget, attention). Instead of merely evaluating a chosen path, this framework forces the user to identify the single best alternative forgone, calculating the net value delta (chosen value minus best forgone value). It is essential for feature prioritization, major commitments, and strategic planning to prevent decisions based solely on immediate perceived gains.

This framework guides decision-makers to structure their thinking by classifying decisions based on the cost and feasibility of reversal. It emphasizes treating low-cost, reversible choices (two-way doors) quickly, while reserving deep deliberation for high-cost, irreversible commitments (one-way doors). It helps mitigate analysis paralysis and premature over-engineering.