Skill UI

This guide provides essential stylistic rules for writing academic manuscripts intended for interdisciplinary audiences, specifically bridging economics and geography. It helps authors structure their arguments, translate complex technical apparatus into prose, and ensure the spatial contribution is legible to both economic and geographical scholars without diluting the core findings.

This guide provides a structured methodology for translating highly technical academic papers, particularly in econometrics or macroeconomics, into plain language suitable for a broad scholarly audience (like the Journal of Economic Perspectives). It focuses on removing notation, jargon, and complex mathematical derivations, while rigorously preserving the underlying economic intuition and causal mechanism of the research.

A guide on how to present highly convincing empirical evidence in academic writing, especially in economics, when regression tables or complex math are limited. This skill teaches readers to translate statistical findings into clear, impactful prose by focusing on magnitude in plain units, synthesizing the body of evidence, defining ranges of precision, and maintaining intellectual honesty.

This guide helps authors structure and strengthen their contribution claims for top-tier journals in economics and human resources. It emphasizes moving beyond simply stating new evidence by focusing on policy relevance, translating coefficients into natural human-capital units (like dollars or percentage points), and rigorously reconciling findings with prior literature to maximize impact.

This guide provides detailed structural and stylistic rules for polishing academic manuscripts intended for high-impact journals, such as the Journal of Human Resources (JHR). It instructs authors on structuring the abstract, writing results paragraphs, translating coefficients into policy-relevant units, and compressing long-form content to adhere to strict page limits, ensuring the core policy lesson is immediately visible.

This framework guides authors on structuring the contribution section of academic papers, particularly for top-tier journals like JIM. It ensures that theoretical advances are demonstrably driven by the international dimension, and managerial implications translate into actionable, cross-border decision rules, moving beyond generic recommendations.

A comprehensive methodology guide for designing rigorous multi-country or cross-cultural studies, essential for international marketing research. It covers critical steps such as country selection criteria, ensuring construct, translation, and sampling equivalence, and planning for measurement invariance (MGCFA). It guides researchers through advanced designs including cross-cultural experiments, multi-level estimation, and handling secondary export/entry-mode data.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier academic journals, particularly the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It instructs authors on how to translate empirical or analytical results into a clear, dual-payload contribution that advances the technology–organization–economics nexus, ensuring the finding has both theoretical depth and practical manager relevance.

A comprehensive guide for developing rigorous, mechanism-based theoretical arguments for operations management (OM) empirical studies. It teaches how to translate general theories (like RBV or TCE) into specific, testable operational mechanisms, specifying appropriate levels of analysis, mediators, and moderators required for top-tier academic publications.

This skill helps authors assess the suitability of their translational or mechanistic manuscript for the Journal of Clinical Investigation (JCI). It provides detailed guidance on meeting JCI's high standards, emphasizing primary evidence from human clinical samples, clear mechanistic insight into disease, and appropriate framing. Use this tool when targeting JCI or when needing to select the most appropriate high-impact scientific venue.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN). It assesses the suitability of clinical, translational, or basic science studies across kidney disease, dialysis, and transplantation. Provides detailed expectations regarding mechanistic significance, evidence bar, reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), and manuscript structure.

This guide helps authors sharpen the academic contribution of public finance research. It instructs users on translating mere statistical findings (coefficients) into policy-relevant parameters, welfare verdicts (e.g., DWL, MVPF), or mechanisms that advance the understanding of the economic role of government. It emphasizes linking research outcomes to normative policy choices.