Skill UI

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for submitting high-impact clinical and population research to The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. It details the journal's specialized scope, which favors practice-changing randomized trials and major prospective cohorts in respiratory and critical care. The guide highlights the rigorous evidence bar, including expected reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), statistical rigor, and structural house style, serving as a crucial fit and framing aid for authors.

This skill processes unstructured, rambling, stream-of-consciousness input (like dictation or brainstorming) into a highly structured 'echo' audit. It captures the user's core mission, locked decisions, open questions, and all model inferences, ensuring the user verifies the model's belief, not just the stated doubts. Ideal for refining fuzzy ideas before committing to work.

This skill generates fully valid Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool (.tm7) files. It translates complex system architectures, including components, data stores, data flows, and external actors, into the required WCF DataContractSerializer XML format. Use it for structured STRIDE threat modeling outputs compatible with Microsoft's official tool.

A comprehensive guide for producing the mandatory supplementary video figure for UIST submissions. This material treats the 3-minute video as core evidence, detailing requirements for resolution (1080p/4K), codec (H.264), and anonymity. It guides authors on scripting the video around key claims, ensuring uncut interaction loops, and maintaining academic rigor to convince reviewers of the system's reality.

A comprehensive guide for optimizing computer science manuscripts targeting the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC). It covers core systems research fields (OS, networking, storage, security), defining the required evidence bar (built artifacts, clean evaluation), and re-framing the paper's contribution to align with top-tier systems venue expectations.

A specialized guide for assessing whether a storage systems or file system manuscript fits the USENIX FAST conference. It covers venue positioning, required evidence (realistic workloads, fault models), appropriate framing, and comparison methodologies necessary for top-tier systems conference submissions.

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory and optional evaluation phases for academic security artifacts, such as those required for USENIX Security. It covers Phase-1 (availability) checks and Phase-2 (functionality, reproducibility) requirements. Provides best practices for structuring code, managing technical hazards (e.g., dangerous-by-default behavior), and ensuring verifiable, reproducible results for peer review.

Outlines the mandatory, multi-stage process for authors preparing final, camera-ready papers for USENIX Security. This guide covers critical post-acceptance steps, including de-anonymizing the manuscript, ensuring all mandated artifacts are permanently available (Open Science policy), updating ethical considerations, and meeting publication standards before final submission deadlines.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research papers for top-tier security conferences like USENIX Security. It covers defining coverage against 'Big-Four' and specialty venues, ensuring novelty across multi-cycle academic pipelines, identifying mechanism-level differentiators, and mastering double-blind citation mechanics for maximum impact.

This guide covers the mandatory Open Science appendix for high-level security research. It instructs authors on enumerating all artifacts (code, datasets, configurations), documenting data withholding decisions, and implementing engineering controls (like environment pinning and version tracking) to ensure that published results are independently and reliably reproducible.

This comprehensive guide details the academic submission lifecycle for USENIX Security. It maps out the multi-stage review pipeline, from initial submission through early rejection to final notification. It critically updates authors on the current decision vocabulary (e.g., Shepherd Approval, retired major revisions), emphasizing mandatory review foci like ethics adequacy, threat-model realism, and openness posture for strategic planning.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage submission process for USENIX Security Symposium papers. It covers mandatory formatting rules, including the 13-page main body and required appendices for Ethical Considerations and Open Science. The guide also details critical steps for maintaining double-blind anonymity, managing complex HotCRP deadlines, and avoiding early rejection pitfalls.