技能 产品商业 战略简报生成器

战略简报生成器

v20260826
brief
根据主题或办公室会议产出生成一页战略简报,明确待决策问题、备选方案、假设、约束和成功标准。作为战略冲刺流程的第一步,支持董事会对定价调整、市场进入等关键决策的前置梳理。
获取技能
330 次下载
概览

/cs:brief — One-Page Strategy Brief

Command: /cs:brief <topic> or /cs:brief <office-hours-output>

Turns intake (raw question or office-hours output) into a one-page strategy brief that the boardroom can deliberate on. This is Step 1 of the strategic sprint pipeline.

Pipeline Position

/cs:office-hours  →  /cs:brief  →  /cs:boardroom  →  /cs:decide  →  /cs:execute  →  /cs:post-mortem
                       ↑ you are here

Inputs

  • A topic string, or
  • An office-hours brief (preferred — more rigor)
  • ~/.claude/company-context.md (loaded automatically)

Output

A single Markdown file under ~/.claude/briefs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md with this structure:

# Strategy Brief: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Author:** cs-chief-of-staff
**Status:** DRAFT | UNDER REVIEW | APPROVED | RETIRED

## Context
[1-2 paragraphs: where the company sits today on this topic — pulled from company-context.md]

## Question
[The one sentence question the boardroom must answer]

## Options
1. **Option A:** <name> — <one-sentence summary>
2. **Option B:** <name> — <one-sentence summary>
3. **Option C:** <name> — <one-sentence summary>

(Minimum 2 options. "Do nothing" is always an option.)

## Assumptions
- <assumption 1 — explicit>
- <assumption 2>
- <assumption 3>

## Constraints
- Time: <by when must this decide>
- Money: <budget envelope>
- People: <who can / can't be reallocated>
- Reversibility: <one-way door | two-way door>

## Affected Roles
[Which cs-* advisors should weigh in. Used to route to /cs:boardroom panel composition.]

- [ ] cs-ceo-advisor
- [ ] cs-cfo-advisor
- [ ] cs-cto-advisor
- [ ] cs-cmo-advisor
- [ ] cs-cro-advisor
- [ ] cs-cpo-advisor
- [ ] cs-coo-advisor
- [ ] cs-chro-advisor
- [ ] cs-ciso-advisor
- [ ] cs-general-counsel-advisor
- [ ] cs-cdo-advisor
- [ ] cs-caio-advisor
- [ ] cs-cco-advisor
- [ ] cs-vpe-advisor
- [ ] cs-chief-of-staff

## Success Criteria
[Measurable outcomes that define success — set BEFORE the decision]
- <metric 1, threshold, timeframe>
- <metric 2, threshold, timeframe>

## Kill Criteria
[What signal would tell you in 90 days that this was the wrong call]
- <metric, threshold, action if missed>

Workflow

  1. Load company-context.md via context-engine
  2. If input is office-hours output, parse the 6 answers
  3. If input is a raw topic, prompt the founder for the missing pieces
  4. Draft 2-3 options (never just one — every brief needs a counterfactual)
  5. Make assumptions and constraints explicit
  6. Identify affected roles → drives panel composition for /cs:boardroom
  7. Write success + kill criteria BEFORE the decision (this is the rigor moment)
  8. Save to ~/.claude/briefs/

Why This Step Exists

The biggest decision-making failure is debating implementation before agreeing on the question. The brief locks the question, options, and success criteria so the boardroom can deliberate without scope creep.

This is also the artifact handoff — the next command consumes this file, not your memory.

Routing

  • /cs:boardroom <brief> — multi-role deliberation
  • /cs:cross-eval <brief> — multi-model sanity check before boardroom (for high-stakes)
  • /cs:freeze <brief> — cooldown lock for irreversible decisions

Related


Version: 1.0.0

信息
Category 产品商业
Name brief
版本 v20260826
大小 3.82KB
更新时间 2026-09-05
语言