The orchestrator for a Critical Inquiry submission. Figure out the stage and the format, then send the user to the matching skill. CI is interdisciplinary criticism and theory — not a single discipline's house organ — so the router's first job is to make sure the essay is built around a theoretical intervention that matters across fields, not a competent reading with no stakes.
ci-revision-and-response)| Situation | Format | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original argument, interdisciplinary stakes | Article (≤ 9,500 words) | normal pipeline below |
| Reply to or debate with a published CI piece | Critical Response (≤ 3,000 words) | ci-argument-and-intervention + ci-scholarly-positioning |
| Short notice of a book/exhibition | Review (≤ 500 words) | ci-writing-style + ci-submission |
| A themed cluster of essays | Special issue (editor-proposed) | ci-review-process (proposal route) |
The 9,500-word article cap includes discursive notes and all bibliographical information — plan the notes into the budget from the start (see
ci-writing-style).
Is this a CI-shaped problem? → ci-topic-selection
Whose conversation am I entering? → ci-scholarly-positioning
What is the intervention? → ci-argument-and-intervention
What objects does it read? → ci-evidence-and-objects
Which theory, used how? → ci-theory-and-method
How is the essay built? → ci-structure-and-exposition
Does the prose earn the claim? → ci-writing-style
Notes / images / Chicago style? → ci-citation-and-style
How will it be judged? → ci-review-process
Ready to submit? → ci-submission
Got a decision / revise request? → ci-revision-and-response
topic-selection → scholarly-positioning → argument-and-intervention → evidence-and-objects → theory-and-method → structure-and-exposition → writing-style → citation-and-style → review-process → submission → revision-and-response
Iterate: most essays loop argument ↔ objects ↔ theory several times before the prose settles.
| Symptom in the draft | Actual problem | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Sentences polished, paragraphs still reorderable | Structure, not prose | ci-structure-and-exposition |
| Readers praise the readings yet ask "so what?" | No intervention yet | ci-argument-and-intervention |
| Theory citations pile up while the claim stalls | Theory as décor | ci-theory-and-method |
| Claim sounds right; nothing on the page earns it | Objects not testing it | ci-evidence-and-objects |
| Word count blown though the body reads lean | Notes eating the cap | ci-citation-and-style |
| Confident essay; only one subfield would care | Fit and framing | ci-topic-selection |
ci-citation-and-style early — rights can outlast a decision.Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the object, theoretical stakes, interpretive turn, and permission/citation discipline; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: humanities reviewers who expect a strong interpretive intervention rather than an empirical-results narrative.
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.【Stage】topic / positioning / intervention / objects / theory / structure / prose / citations / review / submit / revise
【Format】Article / Critical Response / Review / Special issue
【Route to】ci-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
../../resources/external_tools.md — archives, image and text sources, theory shelf, Chicago tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official CI URLs behind every fact in this pack