技能 职场通用 学术稿件投稿预检清单

学术稿件投稿预检清单

v20260724
etp-submission
本指南是学术论文投稿的综合预检清单,用于投稿至ETP期刊。它涵盖了从是否完成双匿名化处理、格式要求(如APA格式、页数限制),到撰写投稿信函等所有关键步骤。帮助作者在正式提交前进行全面的自查,确保稿件流程和格式符合期刊的严格要求。
获取技能
94 次下载
概览

Submission Preflight (etp-submission)

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne
  • Unsure which files, statements, and format ETP's submission system expects
  • Confirming the page limit, font/spacing, and APA style are met
  • Deciding between Original Article and Research Brief
  • Verifying the manuscript is properly anonymized for double-anonymized review

Process facts (source map refreshed 2026-06; re-confirm on the SAGE author-instructions page)

  • ETP is published by SAGE on behalf of Baylor University and is the official journal of USASBE. Submission is through ScholarOne Manuscripts at mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ETP. Manuscript file format: Word preferred.
  • Editor-in-Chief: Johan Wiklund (Syracuse University) is the editor of record (verified 2026-06-22). A 2026 "ETP at 50" editorial signals his departure and an editorial transition; a successor was not yet named publicly as of 2026-06-22, so confirm the current Editor-in-Chief on the SAGE ETP editorial-board page before addressing a cover letter to a named editor.
  • Peer review is double-anonymized — the manuscript itself (not just the title page) must be scrubbed of author identity: remove author names/affiliations, anonymize self-citations ("Author, 2020"), strip acknowledgments and identifying file metadata, and avoid telltale dataset or institution references.
  • Length: Original Articles are typically ≤40 pages, double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman, 1-inch margins (no lower limit). Research Briefs ≤20 pages plus tables and references. Confirm whether tables/references count against the limit on the current author-instructions page (待核实).
  • References: APA style throughout.
  • Abstract: required; confirm the exact word limit on the current author-instructions page (待核实).
  • ORCID, data availability / open-data statements, and any funding/conflict declarations: SAGE policies apply — confirm which are required at submission on the current page (待核实).
  • Fees: ETP is a subscription (hybrid) journal; there is no submission fee, and an APC applies only if you choose open access (Sage Choice) (verified 2026-06-22) — confirm the current APC figure and waiver terms before relying on them.

Preflight checklist

Anonymization (double-anonymized)

  • Author names/affiliations removed from the manuscript body and headers
  • Self-citations anonymized in text and reference list
  • Acknowledgments, funding, and thanks moved out of the anonymized file
  • File metadata/properties scrubbed of author identity
  • No identifying dataset/institution tells that reveal the team

Format & style

  • Word file; double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman, 1-inch margins
  • Original Article ≤40 pages (or Research Brief ≤20 pages) — article type chosen deliberately
  • APA references throughout; in-text citations match the reference list
  • Abstract present and within the current limit (待核实)
  • Tables/figures formatted per SAGE/APA, called out near placement
  • A theoretical/mechanism figure (and Gioia data structure for inductive work) included

Files & declarations on ScholarOne

  • Anonymized main manuscript + separate title page (with author details)
  • Cover letter naming the contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice and why ETP
  • ORCID linked; data availability statement; conflict/funding declarations as required (待核实)
  • Confirmed the paper is not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting a file that still names the authors or de-anonymizes via self-citation (breaks double-anonymized review)
  • Exceeding the page limit and hoping the editor overlooks it
  • Mixing citation styles or letting in-text cites diverge from the reference list (not APA-clean)
  • A cover letter that pitches only theory and ignores ETP's practice mandate
  • Treating ETP like JBV/AMJ's submission system — the portal, limits, and house style differ

Output format

【Anonymization】names/self-cites/metadata scrubbed for double-anonymized review? [Y/N]
【Format】Word / double-spaced / 12pt Times / 1in margins? [Y/N]
【Length】Original ≤40pp or Brief ≤20pp; article type chosen? [Y/N]
【Style】APA references + matched in-text cites? [Y/N]
【Abstract】present and within limit (待核实)? [Y/N]
【Exhibits】mechanism figure (+ Gioia if inductive) included? [Y/N]
【Declarations】ORCID / data statement / conflicts as required (待核实)? [Y/N]
【Cover letter】names theory + practice contribution and why ETP? [Y/N]
【Next step】submit via ScholarOne (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ETP) → etp-review-process

Worked vignette: a self-citation that breaks anonymization (illustrative)

A team submits an otherwise clean manuscript. In the theory section they write: "Building on our earlier finding (Smith & Jones, 2021) that nascent founders…" and the reference list shows Smith and Jones as the only two authors — who are also the submitting authors. Under ETP's double-anonymized review this is a de-anonymization: any reviewer can infer the authorship. The fix is not to delete the citation (which would orphan a needed reference) but to anonymize it in text — "prior work has found that nascent founders… ([Author], 2021)" — and place the full reference in a separate, non-anonymized title-page file along with names, affiliations, acknowledgments, and funding. Then scrub the Word document's properties (author metadata) and check headers/footers. The substance is unchanged; the team's identity is no longer leaked into the file the reviewers see.

Supplementary resources

信息
Category 职场通用
Name etp-submission
版本 v20260724
大小 4.2KB
更新时间 2026-07-28
语言