Submission Preflight (hrm-submission)
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne
- Unsure how to anonymize for double-blind review and what goes on the separate title page
- Confirming APA style, the data-availability statement, and ORCID are in order
- Making sure the manuscript will clear the EIC's fit-and-relevance screen, not just the rules
Process facts (source map refreshed 2026-06; re-confirm on the official Wiley author page)
-
Human Resource Management is a Wiley journal (Online ISSN 1099-050X; Print ISSN 0090-4848). Submission is via Wiley ScholarOne / Manuscript Central (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
-
Double-blind review: the manuscript must be anonymized (no author names, affiliations, self-identifying citations, or acknowledgments in the main file); author details go on a separate title page uploaded as a distinct file (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
-
Editorial screen: the Editor-in-Chief determines whether a paper meets the quality and relevance bar before it is sent to review — papers without a clear scholarly advance and a practical implication are desk-rejected.
-
References: APA style (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
-
Data sharing: Wiley's data-availability policy applies; include an appropriate data-availability statement (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
-
Editorial team: Co-Editors-in-Chief Fang Lee Cooke (Monash) and Shaun Pichler (Cal State Fullerton; co-EiC from Jan 2025) (verified 2026-06-22 via Wiley; re-verify before submission as the board rotates).
-
Exact word/abstract limits, article-type list, ORCID requirement, and any APC / open-access options are 待核实 — confirm on the live author-guidelines page before submitting.
Preflight checklist
Anonymization & files (double-blind)
Style & structure
Declarations & policy
The screen check (do this last)
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a main file that still names the authors or affiliations (breaks double-blind)
- Treating the title page as part of the anonymized manuscript
- Non-APA references, or inconsistent in-text citation style
- Omitting the data-availability statement
- Submitting to HRM via the wrong portal/journal (confusing it with HRMJ, the UK journal)
- Ignoring the practice payoff and hoping the rigor alone clears the EIC screen
Output format
【Anonymization】main file clean + separate title page? [Y/N]
【Style】APA references + house style? [Y/N]
【Abstract/limits】within limit (待核实) + dual contribution stated? [Y/N]
【Data policy】availability statement prepared? [Y/N]
【Declarations】ethics / COI / funding complete? [Y/N]
【Screen check】scholarly advance AND practice payoff visible up front? [Y/N]
【Portal】Wiley ScholarOne (not HRMJ)? [Y/N]
【Next step】submit via ScholarOne → hrm-review-process for what to expect
Supplementary resources