Kidney International (kidney-international)
Journal positioning
Kidney International is the flagship journal of the International Society of Nephrology
(ISN), publishing high-impact nephrology and hypertension research with an explicitly
global, international perspective across clinical and translational science: kidney
disease epidemiology and trials, dialysis and transplantation, and mechanistic kidney
biology with clear human relevance. Its defining expectation is a clinically or
translationally important advance in kidney health that matters across diverse health
systems and populations, with strong representation of global-health, epidemiologic,
and outcomes nephrology alongside disease mechanism — not a narrow single-center series
or a basic experiment with no human anchor. Compared with the U.S.-society sibling, KI
leans toward international clinical breadth and translational relevance. This skill is a
fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and
does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting,
re-check the live Kidney International author instructions.
When to trigger
- The author names Kidney International for a nephrology, hypertension, or kidney
translational study and wants a fit/framing check.
- A kidney study must be re-framed around international clinical relevance, outcomes, or
disease mechanism with human anchoring.
- The author is choosing between Kidney International and the Journal of the American
Society of Nephrology (ASN flagship), or general medicine.
- The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and global-health/
epidemiology expectations.
Scope & topic fit
- Clinical nephrology and hypertension: CKD, AKI, glomerular disease, and blood-pressure/
kidney interactions across diverse populations.
- Kidney-disease epidemiology and global-health nephrology: burden, access, and outcomes
across health systems and resource settings.
- Dialysis and transplantation: outcomes, modality, access, and organ-preservation
research with international relevance.
- Translational kidney science: biomarkers, genetics/genomics, and mechanism studies with
validated human relevance.
- Clinical trials and large multinational cohorts with kidney endpoints.
- Hypertension and cardio-renal research connecting kidney function to systemic outcomes.
Method & evidence bar
- Clinical studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered kidney
endpoints; trials require prospective registration and the registration number.
- The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials,
STROBE for observational/epidemiologic work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, ARRIVE for
animal studies.
- Epidemiologic and global-health studies must address representativeness, confounding,
bias, and generalizability across settings explicitly.
- Translational claims need validated human relevance (tissue, biofluids, or cohorts);
basic experiments need controls and biological replication.
- Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures;
causal language must match the design.
- eGFR/biomarker methods, kidney-outcome definitions, and statistical-analysis plans must
be explicit.
Structure & house style
- ISN format with a structured abstract and a translational/lay-significance statement;
re-check current article types (Clinical Investigation, Basic Research, etc.) and limits
on the live guide.
- The introduction frames the global clinical or biological gap; the discussion states the
practice implication and bounds generalizability.
- A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA flow diagram is expected for the relevant clinical design;
animal work reports ARRIVE-aligned detail.
- Figures show representative data with statistics and N; a supplement carries full methods,
the protocol/SAP, and additional analyses.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.md and
../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and ISN anchors,
then cite the current Kidney International page you checked.
- Search the live site for "Kidney International ISN instructions for authors" and follow
the current version.
- Re-check article types, abstract and significance-statement format, and word/figure/reference limits.
- Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE),
data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
- Re-check IRB/ethics and consent, transplant-donor consent where relevant, animal-care/IACUC
approval, ICMJE authorship and conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions
win.
Pre-submission self-check
Common desk-reject triggers
- Single-center descriptive series with limited generalizability and no broader relevance.
- Epidemiologic analyses with inadequate confounding control or overstated causal claims.
- Basic experiments with no human anchor, replication, or ARRIVE-aligned rigor.
- Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
- Incremental dialysis/transplant or hypertension outcome reports with limited novelty or scope.
Re-routing decision
- U.S.-society, mechanism-forward nephrology with deep basic science →
journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology.
- Diabetic kidney disease centered on endocrine/metabolic mechanism →
diabetologia / journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism.
- Critical-care AKI dominated by ICU organ-support →
critical-care-medicine / american-journal-of-respiratory-and-critical-care-medicine.
- Broad practice-changing nephrology trial → general medicine (
jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).
- Pure renal cell biology with no disease/population anchor → a basic-science venue in the natural-science bundle.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Kidney International (ISN)
[Specialty tags] <clinical nephrology / hypertension / epidemiology / transplant + global relevance>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / animal-ARRIVE>
[Method/evidence] <power, generalizability, mechanism/human anchoring, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / consent / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>