POPL学术论文投稿与评审流程

v20260724

popl-review-process

本指南详细介绍了投稿至POPL会议的论文完整学术周期。内容涵盖了从双盲评审、撰写作者回复、接受条件到强制修订等所有关键阶段。它解释了学术委员会如何评估论文的严谨性、正确性和意义，是研究人员了解顶级学术发表标准与流程的必备参考资料。

学术论文审稿投稿发表计算机科学流程

235 次下载

概览

POPL Review Process

POPL's pipeline is a conference cycle that ends in a journal issue. The shape below is the POPL 2027 process as posted (read 2026-07-08 via search renderings; author response window and revision deadline were not fully rendered — 待核实).

Pipeline

Stage	POPL 2027 anchor	What is actually being decided
Submission	July 9, 2026 AoE, `popl27.hotcrp.com`, no abstract deadline	Format compliance (summary rejection is real) and reviewer assignment
Reviewing	full double-blind, as in POPL 2023-2026	Correctness plausibility, novelty of the formal idea, significance to PL principles
Author response	optional, multi-day, concise	Whether standing objections survive your best factual answer
Decision	notification October 5, 2026	Reject vs conditional acceptance — no unconditional accept exists
Revision gate	deadline set by the committee (待核实 for 2027)	Whether the revision satisfies the committee's stated conditions; failure risks rejection
Publication	PACMPL Issue POPL (Vol 10 = 2026, published Jan 8, 2026)	Journal article, presented at the January symposium (2027: Mexico City, Jan 10-16)

How a POPL committee reads

The first question is what is the formal contribution — a semantics, a type system, a logic, a proof technique — and whether it is stated precisely enough to be wrong. Papers that never risk a sharp claim are marked "unclear contribution."
Correctness is probed by attempted counterexample. Expect at least one reviewer to push on the strangest corner of your calculus: open terms, empty contexts, non-termination, the interaction of two features you analyzed separately.
Significance at POPL means the idea travels: another researcher can apply your logical relation, your translation, your proof method to their language. A theorem locked to one artifact language travels poorly.
Full double-blind changes the sociology: nobody is extending credit to a famous group's proof style. Identities unblind only after conditional-acceptance decisions, and only for the papers that crossed.

Reading the decision

Conditional acceptance arrives with explicit conditions — typically clarifications, scoping of overclaims, or presentation surgery. Treat the condition list as a contract: the Review Committee re-checks each item, and the call states the revision must be satisfactory "or risk rejection." Rejection reviews, in turn, sort into fix-and-resubmit (misread contribution, presentation collapse) versus fundamental (the theorem is true but nobody at this venue needs it) — popl-topic-selection handles the second kind.

Distinguished Papers are capped at 10% of acceptances, chosen by the committee for relevance, originality, significance, and clarity (POPL 2026 call wording); at least one 2026 award is publicly attested. It is not something authors apply for.

Output format

[Stage] pre-submission / under review / response window / awaiting decision / revision gate / production
[Next event] <date + source URL, or 待核实>
[Live risks] <correctness doubt / significance doubt / condition list items>
[Recommended posture] <what to prepare now for the next stage>

信息

Category 未分类

Name popl-review-process

版本 v20260724

大小 3.54KB

Source brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

更新时间 2026-07-29