PRL Submission Preflight (prl-submission)
When to trigger
- "Submitting tonight" — the last check before the upload button
- You are unsure which files the APS submission system expects
- You need to confirm the manuscript passes the automated length check
- You want a single gate before handing off to peer review
Pre-submission checklist
Length and format
Files
Classification and metadata
Authors and integrity
Referees
Self-consistency
Submission-system notes
- Submit through the APS editorial system; verify the current portal URL and account requirements on the PRL author page.
- The automated length check runs at submission — fix overages before uploading (use
prl-length-management).
- Keep the SM as a distinct upload, not appended to the Letter PDF.
- Review is single-blind with subject-area / divisional editor tracks; the classification you pick steers which desk triages the Letter.
- Fees are no blocker under the subscription route: the page charge is optional, CC-BY open access carries an APC (~$2,700 — confirm live), and SCOAP3 covers eligible high-energy-physics Letters.
Night-before dry run
Run this sequence the evening before, not at the upload screen:
-
Clean compile. Build the REVTeX source from scratch in a fresh directory to catch machine-local dependencies.
-
Length estimate. Apply the current APS formula — body, figures by printed area, equations, references — and leave a margin below the limit.
-
Pointer audit. Confirm every "Supplemental Material" mention maps to real SM content, and no S-prefixed item goes uncited.
-
Metadata dry-fill. Draft the portal fields in a text file so the live session is transcription, not composition.
-
Freeze. No content edits after the dry run; any change reopens the length check and pointer audit.
Desk-return triggers to eliminate
| Trigger |
Why editors bounce it |
| Fails the automated length check |
Hard gate; no editorial discretion |
| Wrong article type (regular article) |
Routed off the Letter track entirely |
| Abstract in portal differs from manuscript |
Ambiguous record of submission |
| SM appended inside the Letter PDF |
Breaks separate-SM production |
Anti-patterns
- Discovering an over-length only when the automated check rejects it
- Uploading the SM glued onto the end of the Letter PDF
- Wrong article type (regular article instead of Letter)
- Broken "see SM" cross-references after last-minute trimming
- Outdated subject classification or missing required statements
- Forgetting to disclose a prior arXiv version
Output format
【Length check】pass (per APS formula) / fix
【Format】REVTeX / accepted; article type = Letter? yes / fix
【Files】Letter / figures / SM / cover letter / bib — all present?
【Classification】subject area + current scheme applied? yes / fix
【Authors】criteria, ORCID, originality, prior-version disclosure
【Referees】suggested + opposed entered? yes / fix
【Stands alone】yes / fix
【Next】await reports → prl-revision; plan referees → prl-referee-strategy
Attached resources
Portal URL, length formula, classification scheme, and required statements are volatile — verify all on the official APS / PRL author page before submitting.