The orchestrator for a Social Psychology Quarterly submission. Figure out the stage, the tradition, and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. SPQ is the journal of sociological social psychology — the router's first job is to make sure the paper connects social structure or process to the individual (self, interaction, group), not that it is psychology with a survey attached.
spq-rebuttal)| Situation | Tradition / type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning-making, self, interaction order, accounts | Symbolic interaction (often interview/observation) | normal pipeline; spq-research-design (interpretive) |
| Social structure / status shaping the self, well-being, attitudes | Social structure and personality (survey/secondary) | normal pipeline |
| Status, expectation states, exchange, legitimacy, justice | Group processes (usually experimental) | normal pipeline; spq-research-design (experiment) |
| Identity salience/verification, affect/emotion modeling | Identity / affect programs | spq-theory-building then design |
| One crisp contribution communicable briefly | Note (≤ 5,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
SPQ is interdisciplinary (sociologists and psychologists publish), but the through-line is always the link between the individual and society. If that link is missing, reframe (back to topic-selection).
Idea / fit? → spq-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → spq-literature-positioning
What's the social-psych argument? → spq-theory-building
Is the design defensible? → spq-research-design
Are the analyses sound? → spq-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → spq-tables-figures
Does it read for the field? → spq-writing-style
Data / materials & ethics? → spq-data-and-transparency
How will it be judged? → spq-review-process
Ready to submit? → spq-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → spq-rebuttal
topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → data-and-transparency → review-process → submission → rebuttal
Iterate: most papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.
spq-data-and-transparency)Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the social-psychological process, measurement, design, and boundary condition across groups or contexts; then test whether the manuscript addresses social-psychology reviewers who expect interaction, identity, group process, or status mechanisms grounded in sociological theory.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md and name the live-check item that could change the upload plan.【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / data / review / submit / rebut
【Tradition】symbolic interaction / social structure & personality / group processes / identity / affect
【Type】Article (≤10,000) / Note (≤5,000)
【Route to】spq-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
../../resources/external_tools.md — sociological-social-psychology data + software by tradition../../resources/official-source-map.md — official SPQ URLs behind every fact in this pack