日语NLP资源对比

Compare Japanese NLP resources for: "$ARGUMENTS" across a few criteria, as a table.

Instructions

Step 0 — Validate input

If $ARGUMENTS is empty or blank, stop immediately and output:

Usage: /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare <tool-name | topic>

Examples:
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare mecab
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare 形態素解析
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare japanese sentence embedding models
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare OCR

Pass a tool name (to compare it against its closest alternatives) or a topic/function (to compare the leading options for that task).

---

使い方: /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare <ツール名 | トピック>

例:
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare mecab
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare 形態素解析
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare 日本語 文埋め込み モデル
  /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:compare OCR

比較したいツール名(その代替と比較)、またはトピック/機能名(その分野の主要な選択肢を比較)を引数に指定してください。

Do not proceed if $ARGUMENTS is empty. Unlike discover, this skill has no empty-argument default — a comparison needs something to compare.

Step 1 — Classify the input: seed mode or topic mode

$ARGUMENTS is: "$ARGUMENTS"

Seed mode — names ONE specific existing tool/library/model (a full GitHub/Hugging Face URL, owner/repo, or a bare tool name, e.g. mecab, fugashi). Pass it through as SEED and proceed to Step 3 in seed mode — the comparison set will be the seed plus its closest peers.

Topic mode — a descriptive/functional phrase with no single specific name (e.g. 形態素解析, japanese sentence embedding models, OCR). Proceed to Step 3 in topic mode — the comparison set will be the leading local matches for the topic.

Step 2 — Locate the data file

RESOURCES_PATH="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/data/resources.json"
[ -f "$RESOURCES_PATH" ] || RESOURCES_PATH="$(find "${HOME}/.claude/plugins" -type f -name resources.json 2>/dev/null | grep "awesome-japanese-nlp-resources/" | head -1)"
echo "RESOURCES_PATH=$RESOURCES_PATH"

Step 3 — Find comparison candidates (inline Python)

Do NOT use the Read tool on resources.json. Run one of the two scripts below, substituting RESOURCES_PATH (Step 2) and, for seed mode, SEED (from Step 1).

Seed mode — locate the seed and score peers by shared category, shared semantic labels, and shared description tokens (IDF-weighted):

python3 << 'EOF'
import json, re, math
from collections import Counter

RESOURCES_PATH = "RESOURCES_PATH"   # from Step 2
SEED_RAW       = "SEED"             # from Step 1

with open(RESOURCES_PATH) as f:
    data = json.load(f)
N = len(data)

STOP = {
    "the","and","for","with","that","this","from","into","your","you","are","was",
    "japanese","nlp","python","library","tool","tools","text","based","using","use",
    "used","language","data","model","models","repository","repo","support","simple",
    "fast","easy","also","can","via","etc","https","http","github","com","www","org",
    "not","but","all","any","other","such","more","most","than","its","each","which",
}

def norm_url(u): return (u or "").lower().rstrip("/")
def subs_of(it): return set(t.strip().lower() for t in (it.get("s") or []))
def family(c):   return (c or "").split("(")[0].strip().lower()
def toks(text):
    return set(w for w in re.findall(r"[a-z0-9]+", (text or "").lower())
               if len(w) >= 4 and w not in STOP)

seed = SEED_RAW.strip().lower().rstrip("/")
gh_m = re.search(r"github\.com/([^/#?]+/[^/#?]+)", seed)
hf_m = re.search(r"huggingface\.co/(?:datasets/)?([^/#?]+/[^/#?]+)", seed)
slug = (gh_m or hf_m).group(1) if (gh_m or hf_m) else (seed if seed.count("/") == 1 else None)
basename = seed.split("/")[-1]

def find_matches():
    exact = [x for x in data if norm_url(x["u"]) == seed]
    if exact: return exact, "exact URL"
    if slug:
        sm = [x for x in data if norm_url(x["u"]).endswith("/" + slug)]
        if sm: return sm, "owner/repo"
        return [], None
    nm = [x for x in data if x["n"].lower() == basename]
    if nm: return nm, "name"
    loose = [x for x in data if basename and (basename in x["n"].lower() or ("/" + basename) in norm_url(x["u"]))]
    if loose: return loose, "loose substring"
    return [], None

matches, how = find_matches()
matches.sort(key=lambda x: -(max(x.get("ns") or 0, x.get("nd") or 0)))
seed_item = matches[0] if matches else None

if not seed_item:
    print("SEED_NOT_FOUND")
    raise SystemExit

print(f"SEED_FOUND via {how}: {seed_item['n']}")
print(f"  url={seed_item['u']}  c={seed_item['c']}")
print(f"  d={seed_item.get('d','')[:200]}")
print()

sub_df, tok_df = Counter(), Counter()
for x in data:
    for s in subs_of(x): sub_df[s] += 1
    for t in toks((x.get("d") or "") + " " + x["n"] + " " + " ".join(x.get("s") or [])): tok_df[t] += 1
def idf_sub(l): return max(0.0, math.log(N / sub_df.get(l, 1)) - 1.5)
def idf_tok(t): return max(0.0, math.log(N / tok_df.get(t, 1)) - 1.5)

seed_cat  = seed_item["c"]; seed_fam = family(seed_cat)
seed_subs = subs_of(seed_item)
seed_tok  = toks((seed_item.get("d") or "") + " " + seed_item["n"] + " " + " ".join(seed_item.get("s") or []))
seed_name = seed_item["n"].lower()
seed_urls = {norm_url(seed_item["u"])} | {norm_url(x["u"]) for x in matches if x["n"].lower() == seed_name}

results = []
for x in data:
    if x.get("status") == "not_found" or norm_url(x["u"]) in seed_urls:
        continue
    score = 0.0
    if x["c"] == seed_cat:            score += 10
    elif family(x["c"]) == seed_fam:  score += 5
    sh_subs = seed_subs & subs_of(x)
    score += 3.0 * sum(idf_sub(l) for l in sh_subs)
    sh_tok = seed_tok & toks((x.get("d") or "") + " " + x["n"] + " " + " ".join(x.get("s") or []))
    score += 1.5 * sum(idf_tok(t) for t in sh_tok)
    if score < 8.0:
        continue
    pop = max(x.get("ns") or 0, x.get("nd") or 0)
    results.append((score + 0.5 * pop, x))

results.sort(key=lambda r: -r[0])
print(f"=== CANDIDATES ({len(results)} peers found; seed + top 6 shown) ===")
print(f"[seed] n={seed_item['n']}  u={seed_item['u']}  c={seed_item['c']}  d={seed_item.get('d','')[:150]}")
for score, x in results[:6]:
    print(f"score={score:.1f}  n={x['n']}  u={x['u']}  c={x['c']}  d={x.get('d','')[:150]}")
EOF

Topic mode — score by keyword match (3–5 stems from Step 1, same conventions as search):

python3 << 'EOF'
import json

with open("RESOURCES_PATH") as f:    # from Step 2
    data = json.load(f)

keywords = ["keyword1", "keyword2", "keyword3"]  # short stems, from Step 1

results = []
for item in data:
    if item.get("status") == "not_found":
        continue
    n = item.get("n", "").lower(); d = item.get("d", "").lower()
    s = " ".join(item.get("s") or []).lower(); c = item.get("c", "").lower()
    al = " ".join(item.get("al") or []).lower()
    text_score = 0
    for kw in keywords:
        kw = kw.lower()
        if n == kw:       text_score += 20
        elif kw in n:     text_score += 10
        if kw in d:       text_score += 5
        if kw in s:       text_score += 3
        if kw in c:       text_score += 2
        if kw in al:      text_score += 10
    if text_score < 8:
        continue
    ns = item.get("ns") or 0; nd = item.get("nd") or 0
    results.append((text_score + max(ns, nd) * 2.5, item))

results.sort(key=lambda x: -x[0])
print(f"=== CANDIDATES ({len(results)} matches; top 6 shown) ===")
for combined, item in results[:6]:
    print(f"score={combined:.1f}  n={item['n']}  u={item['u']}  c={item['c']}  d={item.get('d','')[:150]}")
EOF

Step 4 — Select the comparison set

From Step 3's output, pick 3–6 candidates for the table:

• Seed mode: the seed itself plus its 2–5 closest peers (drop peers that don't actually do a comparable job, even if they scored).
• Topic mode: the top 3–6 matches, preferring ones that are genuinely distinct approaches rather than near-duplicates (e.g. don't list mecab and 3 thin wrappers around mecab as if they were independent options — pick the one or two that matter, plus other real alternatives).

If fewer than 3 solid local candidates exist, run 2–3 WebSearch queries (<topic-en> japanese library, japanese <topic-en> alternatives, <topic-en> japanese huggingface) to find 1–3 more well-known options. You don't need to filter these against the dataset the way discover does — the goal here is just enough real, comparable candidates for a meaningful table, not a completeness audit.

If, even after this, fewer than 2 comparable resources exist, stop and say so — a 1-row table isn't a comparison. Suggest /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:search "$ARGUMENTS" instead.

Step 5 — Choose comparison axes

Pick 3–5 axes that a practitioner would actually use to decide between these specific candidates — do not reuse a generic checklist. Good axes:

• Actually differ across the candidates (an axis where every row is the same is not useful — drop it).
• Are concrete and checkable, not vague ("license" or "supports custom dictionaries", not "good" or "quality").
• Are relevant to the domain. Examples of the kind of axis to look for (not a fixed list — invent axes suited to the actual topic):
  • Libraries/tools: speed, ease of installation/setup, customization (e.g. custom dictionaries, fine-tuning support), language/platform coverage, license permissiveness, active maintenance
  • Models: parameter count / resource requirements, context length, license permissiveness, Japanese-specific tuning vs. multilingual, benchmark performance if known
  • Datasets: size, license/commercial-use permissiveness, annotation quality/type, domain coverage, whether it's still actively updated

Step 6 — Rate each candidate

For each candidate × axis, decide:

• ○ — clearly supports / strong on this axis
• △ — partial support, average, or a notable caveat
• ✕ — does not support / weak on this axis

Ground every rating in evidence:

• Start from the dataset's d/d_ja/s/st/lc fields as a first signal.
• WebFetch each candidate's page (repo README or model card) whenever a rating would otherwise be a guess — required for any claim about license, specific feature support, or benchmark numbers you are not already confident about from well-established knowledge. Cap at 6 WebFetch calls (one per candidate), issued in parallel where possible.

  WebFetch url="https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>" prompt="Extract as JSON: license, key features relevant to <the chosen axes>, install/setup complexity, and any explicit limitations mentioned. If a field is unavailable, set it to null."
  

• For extremely well-known tools/axes where you have high confidence without fetching (e.g. "MeCab is written in C++ and is fast" is common knowledge), it's fine to skip the fetch — but say so is not required per-cell; just don't invent a rating you aren't reasonably confident in. When genuinely uncertain, rate △ rather than guessing ○ or ✕.

Step 7 — Format the output

Language detection rule:

• $ARGUMENTS contains Japanese characters (hiragana / katakana / kanji) → Japanese
• Otherwise → English (default)

## Comparison: "$ARGUMENTS"

| Resource | <Axis 1> | <Axis 2> | <Axis 3> | <Axis 4> |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name](url) | ○ | △ | ○ | ✕ |
| [name](url) | ○ | ○ | △ | ○ |

○ = clearly supports / strong · △ = partial or unverified · ✕ = does not support / weak

**Notes:**
- [name]: one-line justification for any △ or ✕ rating that isn't self-evident.
- [name]: ...

**Recommendation:**
- If <priority A> matters most: [name](url) — why.
- If <priority B> matters most: [name](url) — why.

Sources (if WebFetch/WebSearch used):
- [Title](https://...)

Japanese output template: mirror the structure with ## 比較: "$ARGUMENTS", **注記:**, **おすすめ:**, keeping the ○/△/✕ symbols and legend as-is (they're already language-neutral).

Rules:

• 3–6 rows, 3–5 columns — this is meant to be scannable at a glance, not exhaustive. If you have more good candidates than fit, keep the most relevant/popular ones and mention in a closing line that others exist (pointing to /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:search or /awesome-japanese-nlp-resources:discover).
• Every non-obvious △/✕ needs a one-line reason in Notes — a bare symbol with no justification is not trustworthy.
• Don't pad the table with an axis just to hit a target column count; 3 solid axes beat 5 where two are filler.
• If WebFetch was used, Sources: is mandatory.