Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a single-page academic rebuttal for top-tier AI conferences (e.g., CoRL). It details how to structure the response, focusing on maximizing impact through new, compact evidence (tables/figures) rather than verbose prose. Learn to triage reviewer comments, maintain a professional tone for public record, and optimize space for maximum score movement.

A comprehensive guideline for researchers developing robot-learning papers. It details best practices for experimental design, emphasizing statistical rigor, handling stochasticity (training seeds, initial states), bridging the sim-to-real gap, and ensuring fairness across baseline policy families (BC/RL/VLA). This resource helps ensure claims are supported by credible evidence.

This comprehensive guide establishes a rigorous framework for ensuring reproducibility in robot learning research. It details how to document both the "rerunnable half" (software, simulation versions, training configs, seeds) and the "auditable half" (physical hardware specs, sensors, firmware). Adhering to these standards allows experts to verify and rebuild the experimental results.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit checklist for submitting papers to the CoRL (Conference on Robot Learning). This guide details specific requirements for the submission package, including the mandatory 8-page limit (which must account for a dedicated Limitations section), adherence to double-anonymous rules, and detailed sweeps for preserving author and lab anonymity in text, figures, and videos. Essential for ensuring compliance with complex conference guidelines.

A comprehensive guide detailing the submission rules and best practices for supplementary materials, including videos, appendices, code, and data, for top-tier robotics conferences. It outlines distinct submission channels, strict technical requirements (e.g., 250MB video cap, anonymity), and the necessary transition steps from the review phase to the final camera-ready publication format.

This guide helps researchers determine if their embodied AI or robotics project is best suited for the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL). It provides a rigorous two-axis test—assessing if learning is the core contribution and if embodiment is essential to the claim—to decide between submitting to CoRL, ICRA, IROS, NeurIPS, or other journals.

A specialized routing tool designed for academic researchers submitting manuscripts to top-tier Computer Science and AI conferences. It helps users navigate complex decision points, such as selecting the best venue (e.g., ICML vs NeurIPS), matching contribution types (theory, system, empirical study), and adhering to specific submission guidelines and review constraints.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting research to CVPR, detailing best practices for packaging code, models, and datasets. It covers requirements for review-time reproducibility (sealed-box rules) and long-term public release (licensing, provenance, and version pinning), ensuring that the work is runnable by any skeptical third party.

A comprehensive guide for designing, auditing, and executing rigorous experimental programs for top-tier computer vision papers (e.g., CVPR). It covers essential scientific components, including establishing fair benchmarks, structured ablation studies, documenting failure modes, quantifying computational efficiency, and demonstrating cross-dataset generalization, ensuring the research is reproducible and robust.

A comprehensive guide for hardening deep learning papers, particularly in Computer Vision (CVPR). It details best practices for achieving rigorous reproducibility by utilizing the Compute Reporting Form (CRF), maintaining a detailed recipe ledger, ensuring benchmark split hygiene, and meticulously documenting all training hyperparameters, seeds, and variance analyses for academic publication.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to computer vision conferences, detailing how to structure, organize, and utilize supplementary material. It clearly distinguishes between core claims (which must be in the main body) and supportive evidence, such as full ablation grids, detailed derivations, and video results, which belong in the supplement. The guide covers best practices for handling anonymity, video evidence, and avoiding common submission bugs.

A comprehensive guide for computer vision researchers on strategically positioning their work. It helps assess whether the core contribution is related to visual data or visual computation, providing fit tests and a routing map to recommend the most appropriate top-tier conferences (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS) or journals based on the contribution type and technical maturity.