Skill UI

This skill is designed to review Chinese skill documentation to ensure it meets publishing standards. It systematically checks the clarity of descriptions and the executability of process steps, providing structured feedback in Chinese while maintaining necessary machine enumeration values for technical integrity.

This guide details how to position academic manuscripts within a specific geographic scholarly debate, rather than simply citing domain literature. It teaches authors to identify the "closest prior account," articulate a cross-cutting geographic stake, and engage with core geographic theories to enhance the impact of their findings for an advanced scholarly audience.

A comprehensive guide detailing the process of responding to major or minor revisions from academic journals (like AAAG). It teaches authors how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, address editor and referee concerns methodically, strengthen the core academic argument, and incorporate required methodological and cartographic fixes, ensuring the response is both respectful and scientifically rigorous.

This guide teaches researchers how to rigorously assess a topic's geographic significance and determine its optimal fit within the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). It implements a two-part fit test—ensuring the argument is fundamentally geographic (space/place/scale are load-bearing) and possesses sufficient reach to interest neighboring subfields. It guides authors in choosing the correct area (e.g., Human, Physical, Methods) and appropriate journal venue (Annals vs. specialty). Use this when defining a project scope, overcoming reviewer critiques, or deciding wher...

This guide assists in polishing and formatting academic manuscripts for high-level geographical journals. It ensures adherence to specific academic standards, such as the Chicago Manual of Style (author-date), managing strict word count caps, and structuring the argument to be legible to a broad, interdisciplinary audience. It focuses on elevating prose from subfield jargon to broadly readable academic discourse.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for preparing accepted research papers for final submission to major conferences (e.g., AAAI Press). This process covers strict template adherence, deanonymization of author details, managing copyright transfer, optimizing page counts (including purchasing extra technical pages), and ensuring all source files (LaTeX/Word, figures, bibliography) are correctly formatted for professional publication.

This guide provides a comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for AAAI conference technical papers. It covers crucial aspects like double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility requirements, author policies, and adherence to the latest AI-use guidelines. Use this before submitting to mitigate risks of desk rejection or policy violation.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring supplementary material (technical appendices, code/data ZIPs, multimedia) for AAAI submissions. It emphasizes that core contributions and essential evidence must reside in the main paper, while appendices should only deepen the argument. It covers guidelines for maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring immutability, and achieving reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing high-quality AI research manuscripts intended for major academic conferences (e.g., AAAI). It teaches how to structure the first page for maximum impact, clearly state contributions (method, theory, system, etc.), ensure two-column readability, and address ethical limitations to appeal to a broad, non-specialist committee audience.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted, anonymous conference submission into the final, public camera-ready version for publication. It covers de-anonymization steps, including restoring author details, updating proceedings metadata, reflowing figures for multiagent papers, and integrating rebuttal promises without expanding the core contribution. This ensures adherence to strict publishing standards.

A comprehensive guide on writing literature reviews and related work sections, specifically tailored for high-impact journals like Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It teaches authors how to frame their research by focusing on the incremental contribution (delta), moving beyond simple literature listing to establish clear gaps, contrasting current limitations, and rigorously defining the work's novelty in a structured manner.