Skill UI

This guide provides expert strategies for condensing complex technical research papers into strict academic page limits (e.g., four pages). It focuses on achieving the 'one-pass property' for expert reviewers by optimizing the abstract, introduction, methods, and results sections. Learn how to use protocol one-liners, consolidate tables, and structure claims for maximum rigor and impact under severe page constraints.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for final publication. It details the requirements for a dual-publisher format (ACM and IEEE), covering mandatory steps like de-anonymization, completing dual metadata (ORCID, CCS, DOI), integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep, and permanentizing dataset/firmware links using public DOI archives. This ensures the submission meets the highest standards for academic rigor and publishing platforms.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors submitting technical research papers, clarifying how to split content between the main 18-page body and supplementary artifacts. It stresses that all decision-critical evidence, such as threat models and core results, must reside within the reviewed body to ensure reviewers can adequately evaluate the work without relying on accessing supplemental materials.

A comprehensive guide for planning and executing a scientific paper submission for the ISSTA conference. It maps out all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, submission deadlines, major revisions, and artifact evaluation. The skill provides backward planning heuristics and identifies common failure modes to ensure timely and successful publication.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assemble and audit the Supporting Information (SI) for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript. It ensures every reported chemical result and structure is fully reproducible by an independent chemist, covering detailed procedures, full characterization data (NMR, HRMS, IR), stereochemistry, and crystallographic details (CIF/CCDC).

This guide assists researchers in transforming vague datasets or observations into robust, positive, and economics-driven research questions suitable for prestigious accounting journals (like JAE). It teaches key concepts, such as identifying economic friction, distinguishing between normative and positive questions, establishing plausible identification strategies, and mapping the topic to specific academic domains.

This comprehensive checklist guides academic authors through the final compliance checks for submitting a manuscript to the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS). It covers critical elements such as double-blind anonymization, adherence to APA-6 formatting, confirming manuscript category and length budgeting, and ensuring the inclusion of required components like SEM matrices, minimizing the risk of administrative rejection.

This specialized router guides authors through the entire manuscript development lifecycle for submission to the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS). It does not write the paper, but rather diagnoses the current stage (e.g., vague idea, need for theory, data analysis, or rebuttal) and recommends the precise specialized jais-* skill needed next. It is essential for maintaining the theoretical focus and structural integrity required by JAIS.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors detailing mandatory compliance requirements for high-impact publications. This checklist covers essential elements such as prospective clinical trial registration, IRB/ethics approval statements, obtaining informed consent, adhering to ICMJE authorship criteria, disclosing conflicts of interest, and providing detailed data-sharing plans. Use this when preparing a manuscript for submission to major medical journals.

This guide provides detailed structural advice for authors submitting methods papers to the Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (JBES). It teaches how to balance methodological novelty and empirical relevance, ensuring that both are clearly stated and equally foregrounded in the abstract and introduction, rather than burying one aspect in excessive prose.

This skill guides the generation of a professional and highly structured revision response package for top-tier academic journals. It specifically addresses multi-round, double-blind review processes, ensuring every reviewer comment is addressed point-by-point. The output includes a summary statement, a detailed response table, and the marked revision manuscript, all while adhering to strict rules against identity leakage, making it ideal for streamlining the academic publishing workflow.