Skill UI

A comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for IEEE ICSME conference papers. Covers critical lifecycle steps including the abstract-then-paper two-step deadline, adherence to IEEE two-column formatting and page budgets, maintaining double-anonymous identity, and incorporating open science requirements like data availability statements and artifact links.

This guide serves as a comprehensive project management tool for authors submitting to the IEEE ICSME conference. It provides backward-planning heuristics for the entire lifecycle, covering milestones from abstract registration through paper submission, author response, and final camera-ready artifact preparation, accounting for the single-annual-round structure.

A comprehensive model detailing the rigorous, multi-stage peer review cycle for top-tier security conferences like IEEE S&P. It covers every phase, from initial submission and first-round screening to the three-way decision (Accept/Revise/Reject), ethical committee review, and post-acceptance shepherding. Ideal for authors needing to understand the structural constraints and adversarial nature of academic publishing.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing academic manuscripts aimed at the International Economic Review (IER). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current bottleneck in the writing process. It guides the user through the entire rigorous workflow—from initial topic selection and theory modeling to empirical identification, robustness checks, and submission readiness—ensuring the paper is structured for maximum academic impact.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors preparing their accepted research papers for final publication (camera-ready). This process involves de-anonymization, restoring full author details, updating copyright and metadata, ensuring formal formatting, and managing the release of promised artifacts and code for reproducibility.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) via ScholarOne. This guide details critical academic publishing standards, including the 25-page limit, single-blind review rules, required LaTeX formatting, and the mandatory structure for the GitHub code/data reproducibility deposit. Use this when performing the final checks before submission.

This router guides authors through the entire academic workflow for submissions to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It structures the process from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and rebuttal phase, ensuring the computational contribution is the central focus. It helps authors maintain flow and address the specific demands of the OR/CS intersection.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, mandatory steps required to transform an accepted academic draft into a final, camera-ready version for conference proceedings. It covers critical areas like complete de-anonymization, permanent archiving of datasets and code using DOIs, finalizing ethical statements (IRB), satisfying artifact availability requirements, and adhering to strict ACM publication standards. This process ensures the research output is publicly usable, traceable, and robust.

Comprehensive guide for planning an end-to-end academic campaign submission to IMC. This workflow details backward planning from target cutoffs, managing ethics approvals, handling two annual deadlines, and navigating the One-Shot-Revision path, ensuring a smooth research cycle from data collection to final publication.

This skill is designed to assess the suitability of international macroeconomics and finance manuscripts for the IMF Economic Review. It evaluates the paper's fit, theoretical rigor, evidence quality, and adherence to open-economy principles. It provides crucial pre-submission self-checks, potential desk-reject risks, and re-routing suggestions to guide authors toward the most appropriate academic venue.

This comprehensive guide teaches researchers how to sharply position their economic manuscripts. It helps identify the unique contribution (the 'delta') relative to the closest existing literature, especially when targeting high-impact journals like the IMF Economic Review (IMFER). It emphasizes connecting academic findings to global policy debates and differentiating the work from related fields (JIE, JIMF).