Skills Artificial Intelligence CoRL Conference Paper Submission Audit

CoRL Conference Paper Submission Audit

v20260724
corl-submission
A comprehensive pre-upload audit checklist for submitting papers to the CoRL (Conference on Robot Learning). This guide details specific requirements for the submission package, including the mandatory 8-page limit (which must account for a dedicated Limitations section), adherence to double-anonymous rules, and detailed sweeps for preserving author and lab anonymity in text, figures, and videos. Essential for ensuring compliance with complex conference guidelines.
Get Skill
399 downloads
Overview

CoRL Submission

This is the pre-upload audit for a CoRL paper. The numbers below are the CoRL 2026 requirements as read on 2026-07-08 from the official Instruction for Authors and Call for Papers (corl.org); the 2026 deadline has passed, so apply this skill to a 2027-cycle draft after re-opening the new year's pages — CoRL re-issues its instructions annually and has changed page accounting between cycles.

The 2026 package, itemized

Element 2026 rule Notes
Platform OpenReview, group robot-learning.org/CoRL/2026/Conference Profile + conflicts needed for every author
Abstract registration May 26, 2026 Separate, earlier than the paper
Paper deadline May 29, 2026 Deadline clock/timezone wording 待核实 per cycle
Main text 8 pages, including a mandatory Limitations section Limitations counts toward the limit — budget for it
Not counted Acknowledgments, references, optional appendix Appendix rides in the same PDF
Template corl_2026 LaTeX class Camera-ready later flips to [final] mode
Review model Double-anonymous Applies to paper, supplementary, and any linked site
Supplementary Encouraged; video ≤ 250 MB (strict), ~3 min suggested See corl-supplementary for content strategy

What makes the CoRL audit different

Two venue-specific traps dominate desk problems here, and neither exists in the same form at neighboring conferences:

  1. The Limitations section is not optional and not free. The 2026 instructions require every submission to include a Limitations section — limiting assumptions, failure modes, and how they might be addressed — and it counts inside the 8 pages. Drafts imported from NeurIPS-style templates (where such sections often sit outside the limit) silently overflow. Audit the page budget with Limitations present, not as an afterthought.
  2. Project pages leak identity. Robot-learning papers habitually ship a project website with videos. During review, any link that identifies an author, lab, or institution is an anonymity violation under the 2026 instructions — this includes the URL itself (lab-name.github.io fails even if the page is scrubbed). Use an anonymous hosting pattern or put the video in the supplementary upload instead.

Anonymity sweep for a robot-learning paper

Beyond the standard items (author block, acknowledgments, metadata, third-person self-citation), sweep the modalities specific to this field:

  • Video frames: lab signage, whiteboards, badge lanyards, reflections in glossy robot shells, distinctive lab furniture that appears in your prior papers.
  • Robot livery: stickers, hostnames on monitors, custom end-effectors already associated with your group.
  • Dataset paths burned into figures or config listings (/home/<user>/...).
  • Repository and W&B links in code snippets or appendix listings.
# Mechanical pre-upload pass on the submission PDF and supplementary bundle
pdftotext main.pdf - | grep -nEi 'github\.io|github\.com|wandb|acknowledg|our (lab|group|university)' | head
pdfinfo main.pdf | grep -Ei 'author|creator|producer'
grep -RnEi 'hostname|/home/|api_key' supplementary/code/ | head
stat -c '%n %s' supplementary/video.mp4      # must be <= 250 MB (2026 strict cap)
pdftotext main.pdf - | grep -ci 'limitation' # 0 hits => missing mandatory section

Page-budget strategy under the 8+Limitations rule

  • Write the Limitations section early and hold it at a fixed budget (half a page is a common shape); do not let it become the compression victim of deadline week.
  • Overflow goes to the appendix — reviewers are not obligated to read it, so only non-load-bearing detail (full hyperparameter tables, extra rollouts, per-task breakdowns beyond the headline) may live there.
  • Do not fight the template: class-file modifications, margin edits, and squeezed float spacing are detectable and read as rule-testing to ACs.

Form fields and policy checks

  • Abstract registration first. The 2026 cycle separated abstract (May 26) and paper (May 29); a missed abstract registration forecloses the submission entirely. Register with a stable title and author list.
  • Dual submission: the paper must not be under review elsewhere; the fast-moving robot-learning arXiv culture makes this an easy accident when a workshop version is circulating — check the current CFP's exact scope wording each cycle.
  • GenAI policy: the 2026 Instruction for Authors added a generative-AI policy (announced April 2026); its exact disclosure requirements are 待核实 in this pack — read that section verbatim before submitting.
  • Subject areas / keywords on the form drive reviewer assignment in a small, specialized pool; pick the subfield your harshest competent critic works in.

Pre-upload checklist

[ ] Abstract registered by the abstract deadline (title/authors stable)
[ ] Main text <= 8 pages WITH Limitations section included and substantive
[ ] References + appendix after main text, same PDF, uncounted
[ ] corl_2026 template unmodified; compiles with no page-limit tricks
[ ] Anonymity sweep passed: text, figures, video frames, links, metadata
[ ] Supplementary video <= 250 MB, ~3 min, anonymized end to end
[ ] Code/data (if included) scrubbed of identities, paths, and keys
[ ] OpenReview form: authors, conflicts, keywords, abstract synced with PDF
[ ] Dual-submission status confirmed with every coauthor in writing
[ ] GenAI-policy disclosure handled per the current instructions [待核实]

Re-verify each cycle

Page accounting (the 2026 camera-ready got a 9th page; earlier cycles differed), the Limitations rule, video caps, the GenAI policy, and deadline clock conventions are all chair-set and cycle-volatile. The controlling sources are https://www.corl.org/contributions/call-for-papers and https://www.corl.org/contributions/instruction-for-authors for the live year — open both before trusting any number in this file.

Info
Name corl-submission
Version v20260724
Size 6.29KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language