Skill UI

Workflow to parse external paper reviews, atomize reviewer concerns, and draft a grounded, venue-compliant text rebuttal under strict limits. Supports multiple reviewers, follow-up rounds, and safety checks to avoid fabrication and overpromising. Use when the user needs to reply to reviewers or run an ICML/OpenReview rebuttal.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting a strategic response during the OpenReview cycle. This resource covers how to address reviewer objections, shape the Area Chair's meta-review summary, manage the discussion phase, and decide whether to defend the paper or withdraw for a future revision cycle. Focus on clarity, conciseness, and evidence-based arguments.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

A comprehensive checklist for auditing academic submissions to ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). Covers thematic area selection, formatting constraints (6-8 page limit), enforcing double-blind anonymity, managing OpenReview mechanics, and identifying common desk-reject triggers. Essential for authors preparing technical papers for top-tier conferences.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire end-to-end workflow for submitting and presenting at ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). It breaks down the complex process into distinct phases—from initial thematic scoping and track selection, through the OpenReview abstract submission, paper and supplement delivery, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready preparation, and final conference presentation. It provides actionable advice, risk mitigation strategies, and re-targeting options for both success and rejection.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the academic peer review process used at AISTATS, covering everything from OpenReview submission workflows and author-reviewer dynamics to advanced decision criteria (correctness, significance, empirical support). It helps researchers strategize their submissions and responses to maximize acceptance chances in statistics and machine learning.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a detailed audit checklist for preparing submissions for major AI conferences like AISTATS. It covers critical pre-submission requirements, including maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to strict page limits, managing OpenReview details, and ensuring reproducibility. Use this checklist before the abstract or full-paper deadline to mitigate desk-reject risks.

A comprehensive guide detailing the meticulous steps required to transform an accepted conference paper into its final, public, camera-ready version. It covers de-anonymization, integrating complex reviewer feedback, coordinating artifact release, and ensuring consistency with the permanently recorded OpenReview forum.

This guide provides a comprehensive model of the academic review process used at FAccT. It details the interdisciplinary nature of the review panel (CS, law, social science), the OpenReview workflow, and the strategic implications of the 'Accept/Revise/Reject' decision set. It guides authors on navigating the stages, including rebuttals and revise-and-resubmissions.

This comprehensive guide serves as a pre-flight audit checklist for major academic conference submissions, specifically targeting ICCV. It covers critical process areas, including the single-day upload requirement, strict page budget adherence, maintaining double-blind anonymity, vetting OpenReview fields, and identifying potential identity or formatting leaks. Use this to prevent desk rejection before the deadline.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting strategic responses to conference reviews (e.g., ICLR OpenReview). It covers differentiating public vs. restricted comments, structuring rebuttals, addressing specific concerns (novelty, reproducibility), and maintaining professional communication standards for permanent records.

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps for authors preparing their accepted ICLR paper for camera-ready submission. It covers de-anonymization procedures, incorporating all fixes promised during the discussion period, completing OpenReview metadata, and assembling all necessary presentation assets, including posters, slide decks, and videos, according to current conference guidelines.