Skills Product & Business Econometrics Journal Submission Preflight Checklist

Econometrics Journal Submission Preflight Checklist

v20260724
ectj-submission
This comprehensive guide details the critical steps required before submitting a scholarly paper to Econometrics Journals (EctJ). It covers technical compliance, including adherence to specific LaTeX templates, managing page limits, optimizing summary word counts, correctly placing mathematical proofs, and addressing crucial administrative details like funding disclosure and submission fees. Use this checklist immediately prior to submission to ensure maximum readiness and minimize rejection risks.
Get Skill
101 downloads
Overview

EctJ Submission

Use this immediately before submission through Editorial Express.

Preflight

  • Confirm the manuscript uses the required RES/EctJ LaTeX template and the correct online appendix template if applicable.
  • Check the current page norm. RES guidance says the paper should not normally exceed 20 pages including the printed appendix.
  • Keep the summary within the current limit; RES guidance says no more than 150 words.
  • Include an empirical application, even for theory papers.
  • Keep mathematical proofs in the main text or printed appendix when current RES guidance requires that; do not rely on the online appendix for proofs.
  • Prepare a cover letter only for conflicts, exemptions, or prior reports when current guidance says that is the intended use.
  • Budget the current submission fee. The source map records a flat fee of GBP 75 plus VAT under the 2026 RES policy, with no RES-member discount.
  • Disclose replication restrictions or exemption needs at first submission.

Final hour order

Run the preflight in this order:

  1. Venue facts: reopen resources/official-source-map.md and verify portal, fee, page, summary, proof, and replication requirements against live pages.
  2. Conformance: compile the template PDF, count printed pages, count summary words, and verify proof placement.
  3. Scientific gate: read the first two pages only. They must state the leading case, applied value, and closest incumbent method without relying on later sections.
  4. Package gate: confirm the replication README and master command exist even if the final package is delivered after conditional acceptance.
  5. Administrative gate: fee path, cover-letter reason, data restrictions, and author metadata.

Worked preflight: a specification-test vignette

Illustrative run of the final-hour order on a hypothetical kernel specification-test paper:

  1. Venue facts reopened: fee, page norm, summary limit, and proof placement reverified on live RES pages; one wording change found and noted in the source map.
  2. Conformance: template compile gives 22 printed pages against the 20-page norm. The fix is moving the secondary power grid to the online appendix and merging two bandwidth tables, not shrinking margins; margin tricks are exactly what conformance screens catch.
  3. Summary count: 164 words. Cut the sentence restating the literature; the summary needs only the econometric object, the leading-case result, and the applied payoff.
  4. Scientific gate: the first two pages name the incumbent test, its size distortion under heteroskedasticity (illustrative: 11% rejection at nominal 5%), and the application.
  5. Package gate: the master script reruns the smoke simulation in about nine minutes; the README states that runtime.

Result after fixes: 19.5 pages, a 148-word summary, proofs in the printed appendix — submit.

Editorial Express slip list

  • Metadata fields (JEL codes, keywords) inconsistent with the PDF front page.
  • PDF compiled outside the RES/EctJ template, or the online appendix mixed into the main file instead of the separate appendix template.
  • Fee handled on an outdated amount; reconfirm the current figure and VAT treatment against the journal's current author guidelines on submission day.
  • Cover letter used for marketing; at this venue it exists for conflicts, exemption requests, and prior reports only.
  • Replication exemption needs known to the authors but not disclosed at first submission, which the RES policy expects.

Fee and disclosure notes

  • The recorded RES policy is a flat fee per new submission with no RES-member discount, and it is non-refundable even on desk rejection except for genuine payment errors — budget it as a sunk screening cost.
  • Whether a resubmission after reject-and-resubmit incurs a fresh fee depends on current policy wording; confirm on the live fee-policy page before assuming either answer.
  • Disclosing restricted data at first submission is an RES expectation, because the editorial board decides whether the paper can be considered at all under the replication policy.

Output format

[Submission readiness] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Format checks] <template/page/summary/proofs/appendix>
[Content checks] <leading case/empirical application/simulations>
[Administrative checks] <Editorial Express/fee/cover letter/replication disclosure>
[Blocking fix] <one issue to resolve first>
Info
Name ectj-submission
Version v20260724
Size 4.7KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language