Skills Data Science JIMF Manuscript Workflow Router

JIMF Manuscript Workflow Router

v20260724
jimf-workflow
This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing manuscripts intended for the Journal of International Money and Finance (JIMF). It guides authors through the entire research lifecycle, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to rigorous empirical design, robustness checks, figure creation, and final rebuttal planning. It ensures the paper meets the high standards required for open-economy macro-finance submissions.
Get Skill
100 downloads
Overview

JIMF Workflow Router (jimf-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which jimf- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the Journal of International Money and Finance (JIMF) — Elsevier's field journal (ISSN 0261-5606; online 1873-0639; founded 1982) for international monetary and financial economics. The center of gravity is exchange rates, capital flows, the global financial cycle, cross-border banking, sovereign debt and risk, currency crises, and monetary-policy spillovers — i.e. open-economy macro-finance with an asset-pricing and identification spine. JIMF rewards a paper that takes a cross-country or high-frequency international design and answers a question a central banker, an IMF/BIS economist, or an international-finance professor would recognize as first-order.

The defining workflow tell: JIMF is an Elsevier journal on Editorial Manager, not a society journal. There is no membership gate, no submission fee for a standard paper (open-access APC only if the author chooses gold OA — 待核实), single-anonymized review is the Elsevier default (待核实 — confirm on the live Guide for Authors), and abstracts run ≤250 words with required Highlights and CRediT author statements. Re-verify volatile specifics (editor names, exact APC, blinding) on the official ScienceDirect/Elsevier pages — access checked 2026-06.

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?" on a JIMF-bound paper
  • A draft's binding constraint (fit, identification, exhibits, prose, response letter) is unclear
  • Work is ping-ponging between data/design, framing, exhibits, and the rebuttal
  • The team is comparing JIMF with siblings (JIE, JME, JMCB, JFE) and needs to confirm fit

Routing table

Current symptom Next skill
Scope/outlet fit uncertain; might be a JIE/JME/JMCB paper jimf-topic-selection
Contribution vs. the international-finance frontier is fuzzy jimf-literature-positioning
The causal or structural credibility is the bottleneck jimf-identification
Cross-country/high-frequency sample, measurement, or panel design is fragile jimf-empirical-design
Results may be specification-, sample-, regime-, or inference-sensitive jimf-robustness
Exhibits are dense or do not answer the question jimf-tables-figures
Online appendix is too thin or sprawling; data/code deposit unclear jimf-internet-appendix
Intro/abstract/Highlights miss the JIMF voice jimf-writing-style
Close to submission; need an Editorial Manager preflight jimf-submission
Likely referee objections should be pre-empted jimf-referee-strategy
A decision letter arrived and needs a response plan jimf-rebuttal

Default order

jimf-topic-selection → jimf-literature-positioning → jimf-identification → jimf-empirical-design → jimf-robustness → jimf-tables-figures → jimf-internet-appendix → jimf-writing-style → jimf-submission → jimf-referee-strategy → jimf-rebuttal

jimf-writing-style is late-stage polish: do not rewrite the intro before identification, the cross-country design, and the robustness layer settle. jimf-internet-appendix runs in parallel with exhibits, not after acceptance — JIMF referees check the appendix.

Routing by paper archetype

JIMF papers cluster into four archetypes; the first bottleneck differs by archetype, so enter the chain at the right link.

Archetype Likely first bottleneck Enter at
High-frequency identification (FX / policy-surprise event study, intraday) event-window construction + surprise measurement jimf-identificationjimf-empirical-design
Cross-country panel (capital flows, credit, GFCy exposure) comparability + within-country vs. cross-country variation jimf-empirical-designjimf-identification
Policy / institutional natural experiment (capital controls, FXI, regime switch) a clean control group + endogenous-policy concern jimf-identification
Open-economy model + estimation (UIP deviations, term premia, sovereign default) what data feature identifies each parameter jimf-identificationjimf-robustness

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My event study finds the dollar appreciates after Fed surprises, but a referee says my surprise measure is contaminated by the information channel and my country sample is unbalanced." Two distinct JIMF pushbacks — surprise identification (owned by jimf-identification, separating the pure monetary shock from the central-bank information shock) and panel comparability (owned by jimf-empirical-design, the unbalanced cross-country sample). Route to jimf-identification first; only once the cleaned surprise series is defended do you return to jimf-empirical-design, then jimf-robustness to show the dollar response survives sample and window choices.

Stage gates (advance only when the gate is cleared)

Each handoff has a gate; do not advance a paper past a gate it has not cleared, and route back if a later stage exposes an earlier weakness.

Gate Cleared when
topic → positioning the international margin is load-bearing, not decorative
positioning → identification the contribution is one sentence against a named frontier program
identification → design the global confounder (GFCy / common US shock) is addressed
design → robustness measures, country set, and frequency are declared and defended
robustness → exhibits the result survives dropping the obvious episode and the US
exhibits → appendix the headline international effect is findable in seconds
appendix → style the body is self-contained; the deposit traces to every number
style → submission the abstract (≤250w), Highlights, and JEL land for a policy reader

Minimal decision snippet

if decision_letter_arrived:          -> jimf-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit:                -> jimf-submission
elif anticipating_objections:        -> jimf-referee-strategy
elif intro_or_abstract_weak:         -> jimf-writing-style
elif appendix_or_deposit_unclear:    -> jimf-internet-appendix
elif exhibits_dense:                 -> jimf-tables-figures
elif result_fragile:                 -> jimf-robustness
elif data_or_measurement_shaky:      -> jimf-empirical-design
elif identification_shaky:           -> jimf-identification
elif contribution_fuzzy:             -> jimf-literature-positioning
else:                                -> jimf-topic-selection

Anti-patterns

  • Treating JIMF as interchangeable with Journal of International Economics (real trade + real open-economy macro), JME (domestic monetary/business-cycle), JMCB (domestic money/banking), or JFE (corporate/asset-pricing without the international margin)
  • Polishing prose before the design, contribution, and evidence hierarchy are stable
  • Letting the online appendix carry a claim the main text must establish
  • Quoting volatile process facts (editor, APC, blinding) as permanent rather than marking 检索于 2026-06;以官网为准
  • Submitting an applied-finance paper with no international/open-economy margin — JIMF's reason to exist

Output format

【Target】Journal of International Money and Finance (Elsevier)
【Archetype】high-frequency / cross-country panel / policy experiment / open-economy model
【Current bottleneck】fit / contribution / identification / design / robustness / exhibits / appendix / style / submission / revision
【Next skill】<one jimf-* skill>
【Reason】why this is the binding constraint now
【Source check】official facts verified or marked 待核实 / 检索于 2026-06
Info
Category Data Science
Name jimf-workflow
Version v20260724
Size 7.96KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language