Skill UI

This guide provides a detailed strategy for managing and releasing research artifacts (code, models, data) associated with a vision paper submitted to ECCV. It covers two critical phases: the sealed, anonymous archival submission during review, and the structured public release runway post-acceptance, ensuring reproducibility and adherence to conference policies.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for designing rigorous, falsifiable system evaluations for academic research papers. It details best practices across four critical evidence layers: end-to-end performance, mechanism decomposition, operational cost, and boundary testing. Learn how to ensure workload realism, maintain baseline fairness, structure your experiment matrix, and avoid common pitfalls to meet top-tier systems research standards.

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether their computer systems project—covering areas like OS, distributed infrastructure, cloud computing, and ML systems—is best suited for EuroSys, or if it should target other top-tier venues like SOSP, OSDI, or ASPLOS. It provides rigorous criteria covering built artifacts, transferable ideas, evidence quality, and strategic timing to maximize publication chances.

A framework for transforming empirical findings into portable, testable theoretical arguments, especially for comparative and longitudinal social science research. It guides the user to structure a macro–micro mechanism (e.g., how an institution influences individual choices) and derive cross-level hypotheses, ensuring the argument is generalizable and robust enough for high-level academic publication.

This comprehensive guide helps authors structure and partition their research findings for top-tier academic conferences, such as USENIX FAST. It defines the strict rules for separating core, decision-critical evidence (which must reside in the main body) from supporting materials, artifacts, and appendices, ensuring compliance with page budgets and double-blind review standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting storage-related research to top-tier conferences (e.g., USENIX FAST). It dictates how to structure the paper, emphasizing leading with the specific storage cost addressed (e.g., write amplification, tail latency, endurance) and grounding all claims in proportional, real-device evidence rather than generic performance statements. Essential for ensuring technical rigor and reviewer trust.

This guide details best practices for submitting research artifacts to academic conferences, following the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme. It covers everything from required packaging plans (Docker, README, data provenance) to achieving various levels of validation (Functional, Reusable, Reproduced). Learn how to structure your submission to ensure maximum reproducibility and pass rigorous evaluator checks on a clean machine.

This skill guides authors in developing strong, portable, and highly structured theoretical arguments for manuscripts submitted to top journals like Governance. It focuses on moving beyond mere description by identifying causal mechanisms, defining rigorous scope conditions, and establishing testable, comparative concepts. It helps ensure the theory can travel across different cases and contexts.

Provides crucial guidelines for structuring research papers submitted to ICDM. It details how the 10-page IEEE limit must accommodate the body, in-cap appendices, and references, while effectively offloading bulk material (code, full logs) to an external repository. Essential for avoiding rejection due to page overruns.

This guide provides detailed structuring advice for writing empirical software engineering (SE) research papers for top-tier conferences like ICSE. It focuses on adopting the required academic rigor, including using Research Questions (RQs) as the core skeleton, mastering the 'Threats to Validity' section, and calibrating claims for verifiability. Learn how to structure the abstract, compress content into a 10-page limit, and address reviewer expectations in the SE community.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for authors submitting software artifacts to academic venues like ICSME. It details how to structure packages, track provenance, and document code to achieve the IEEE Open Research Object and Research Object Reviewed badges. Learn how to design for rigorous, reproducible evaluation by evaluators in a bounded time frame.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.