Skill UI

A comprehensive tool designed to help developers compare multiple technical approaches for solving a single problem. It systematically identifies and analyzes the trade-offs, complexity, performance, and learning curves associated with different design patterns (e.g., state management, data fetching, API design). Ideal for architectural reviews and making informed, robust technology stack decisions.

This tool tests your deep understanding of code you have recently written or reviewed. It generates structured, multi-level questions (Recall, Understanding, Application, Analysis, Synthesis) based on the provided code. Users can focus the quiz on specific areas like error handling, performance, or security, making it an excellent mechanism for continuous learning and solidifying technical knowledge.

This tool provides a structured, multi-stage method for learning any technical concept, from basic definitions to advanced implementation details and common pitfalls. It progressively deepens the explanation, making complex topics easy to grasp.

An advanced orchestrator that manages the entire software development lifecycle (SDLC) from initial concept vetting to final code deployment. It guides the process through distinct, sequential stages: Product Direction Review (CEO), Technical Architecture Review (Engineering), Detailed Planning, Validation, and final Execution (PR). This tool ensures all critical gates are passed before writing code, minimizing risks and ensuring alignment.

This gate review forces a transition from vague product direction to a concrete, buildable technical specification. It mandates the creation of architectural diagrams, data flow maps, state machines, and failure mode inventories before a single line of implementation code is written. Essential for complex features with async components or external dependencies.

This robust pipeline guides development teams through a rigorous, five-phase planning process *before* writing any code. It systematically analyzes PRDs, design specifications (UX, accessibility), and existing architecture to produce a comprehensive implementation plan. Key outputs include Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), detailed task breakdowns, and verification strategies, ensuring all technical and design decisions are documented and scoped.

This utility analyzes code changes within a branch compared to the base branch. It calculates a complexity score, detects scope coherence issues (warning if changes are too large or unrelated), and generates a fully structured Pull Request (PR) draft. It automates the creation of titles, comprehensive descriptions (including checklists and technical details), and even suggests splitting the PR into smaller, manageable units, significantly improving code review quality and efficiency.

This tool automatically generates comprehensive release notes from git commits. It analyzes version history, categorizes changes (features, fixes, etc.), and outputs three distinct formats: a technical CHANGELOG.md section, a semi-technical PR body, and a user-friendly Slack announcement. It excels at transforming complex technical jargon into accessible messaging for different audiences.

This comprehensive guide outlines a structured methodology for conducting authorized security testing on desktop thick clients (Win/macOS/Linux). It covers critical attack vectors, including local storage analysis, Inter-Process Communication (IPC) vulnerabilities, network traffic interception, client-side trust boundaries, and advanced reverse engineering techniques using tools like IDA and Ghidra.

A comprehensive guide detailing advanced, authorized techniques for Active Directory security testing and red teaming. It covers critical attack vectors such as Kerberos exploitation, BloodHound path analysis, NTLM relay, and domain privilege escalation. Designed for security professionals to systematically map and exploit domain weaknesses.

This tool summarizes long documents into concise summaries using advanced NLP techniques entirely on your local machine. It ensures maximum data privacy as no external network connections or APIs are required, making it ideal for offline environments and sensitive data processing.

This framework applies the Lindy Effect principle to assess the expected remaining life of non-perishable technologies, ideas, or practices. It treats the current survival age as a strong prior for future longevity, guiding users to favor proven, long-surviving options. It is crucial when making critical, high-stakes choices (like selecting frameworks or protocols) where relevance must last years, requiring checks for domain drift and a clear burden of proof before adopting novelty.