Skill UI

A sophisticated AI system that coordinates multiple specialized agents (e.g., Security Auditors, Performance Analysts, Architecture Specialists) to perform comprehensive, multi-perspective code assessments. It analyzes code context, manages state, and synthesizes conflicting insights to provide deep, holistic reviews for complex software projects.

This skill orchestrates deep critical reviews of research work using external AI models like Codex, Gemini, or Claude. It gathers project context, identifies logical gaps, and provides adversarial feedback on methodologies and results. Suitable for academic papers, experimental validation, and refining research ideas through multi-round reasoning.

Designs systematic ablation studies for ML paper submissions. Helps isolate component contributions, test hyperparameters, and answer reviewer questions. Codex plans experiments while CC implements them, ensuring rigorous validation before submission.

This skill bridges idea discovery and auto review workflows by reading experiment plans, implementing code, deploying to GPU, and collecting results. It supports code review before deployment, parallel execution, and sanity checks. Use it when you have a ready experiment plan or need to execute defined experiments automatically.

This skill structures a highly controlled, bounded development life cycle for AI agents. It mandates a structured three-phase workflow: Planning (Spec), Implementation (Build), and Verification (Review). It is essential for building complex features from scratch, especially when dealing with ambiguous requirements, high risk, or needing explicit human approval gates to ensure the resulting code meets all defined specifications.

A powerful plugin enabling Claude Code to delegate complex tasks to external AI CLIs (such as OpenAI Codex or Google Antigravity/Gemini) without exiting the conversation. It supports multi-model workflows, allowing users to seek a second opinion, cross-check deep analysis, or delegate side tasks (like research or code review). The core value is that Claude synthesizes the raw outputs, providing a critical review and reconciliation of findings across all consulted models.

Delegates coding, code review, and plan review tasks to OpenAI Codex CLI with sandbox controls and security boundaries. Supports autonomous execution, multiple modes, and safe review handling.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for packaging multiagent system (MARL) and game theory evidence for academic submissions, particularly for conferences like AAMAS. It emphasizes that the artifact must be inspectable, containing not just a trained model, but the game definition, environment code, opponent sets, and interaction protocols, ensuring rigorous reproducibility and reviewability.

A guide for researchers submitting to conferences like ACM Multimedia, detailing how to achieve robust result reproducibility. It covers the necessary steps—including logging code commits, data versions, media preprocessing parameters, and hardware details—to allow independent reviewers to successfully rebuild the reported findings and achieve official reproducibility badges.

A comprehensive guide for authors on best practices for packaging, documenting, and ensuring the reproducibility of LLM artifacts (weights, data, code, prompts, etc.). It addresses requirements for anonymous academic review and public post-acceptance release, focusing on reproducibility, licensing, and transparency.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for packaging and releasing scientific artifacts—including code, training configurations, demonstration data, and policy checkpoints—for robotics research papers. It details how to prepare materials for anonymous reviewer assessment and for durable public release, ensuring the work is fully reproducible by the academic community.