Skill UI

This skill structures a highly controlled, bounded development life cycle for AI agents. It mandates a structured three-phase workflow: Planning (Spec), Implementation (Build), and Verification (Review). It is essential for building complex features from scratch, especially when dealing with ambiguous requirements, high risk, or needing explicit human approval gates to ensure the resulting code meets all defined specifications.

The `hf-mem` skill estimates the necessary VRAM or system memory required to load Safetensors or GGUF model weights for inference directly from the Hugging Face Hub. It uses efficient HTTP Range requests, avoiding local downloads. Users can determine if a model fits on their GPU or instance, including optional estimations for the KV cache and setting limits like maximum sequence length.

Automates the creation and publication of polished, functional Gradio demos on Hugging Face Spaces for any user-provided LoRA model. This skill handles the complex workflow of designing the optimal UI, selecting the correct inference pipeline (e.g., text-to-image, video-to-video), and generating all necessary files (app.py, requirements.txt, README.md) to deploy a complete, ready-to-use AI playground.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting evidence packages (artifacts) for NLP research papers, such as code, datasets, prompts, and model outputs. It details requirements for reproducibility, adhering to the Responsible NLP checklist, ensuring proper anonymization, and preparing for post-acceptance public release in academic settings like ACL.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI). This skill helps evaluate manuscript fit, refine scope, understand evidence requirements, and strategically position papers related to AI-infused interaction, adaptive systems, and user modeling for top-tier HCI venues.

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory submission requirements for major AI conferences like CIKM. It covers critical areas such as strict page budget rules (including appendices), mandatory GenAI Usage Disclosure, EasyChair nomination processes, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and adhering to crucial deadlines like the abstract-gate week to prevent desk rejection.

A comprehensive guide for authors on best practices for packaging, documenting, and ensuring the reproducibility of LLM artifacts (weights, data, code, prompts, etc.). It addresses requirements for anonymous academic review and public post-acceptance release, focusing on reproducibility, licensing, and transparency.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit checklist for submitting papers to the CoRL (Conference on Robot Learning). This guide details specific requirements for the submission package, including the mandatory 8-page limit (which must account for a dedicated Limitations section), adherence to double-anonymous rules, and detailed sweeps for preserving author and lab anonymity in text, figures, and videos. Essential for ensuring compliance with complex conference guidelines.

A comprehensive guide detailing the submission rules and best practices for supplementary materials, including videos, appendices, code, and data, for top-tier robotics conferences. It outlines distinct submission channels, strict technical requirements (e.g., 250MB video cap, anonymity), and the necessary transition steps from the review phase to the final camera-ready publication format.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting research to CVPR, detailing best practices for packaging code, models, and datasets. It covers requirements for review-time reproducibility (sealed-box rules) and long-term public release (licensing, provenance, and version pinning), ensuring that the work is runnable by any skeptical third party.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit guide for authors submitting papers to EACL (Computational Linguistics). It covers critical areas such as adherence to format gates (8/4 content pages, required Limitations section), strict anonymity requirements, mandatory declarations (Responsible NLP, preprint status), and crucial advice regarding the single, non-fallback submission cycle. Use this before uploading to the ACL Rolling Review cycle.

A comprehensive guide for computer vision researchers to determine if their project is a good fit for ECCV, considering scope, technical durability, and academic timing. It weighs the project's contribution against the specific requirements of ECCV versus competing top-tier venues like CVPR and ICCV, ensuring strategic submission planning.