Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps required for authors preparing an accepted paper for ACM FAccT proceedings. It details the transition from anonymous drafts to the final, published 'camera-ready' format, covering mandatory de-anonymization (restoring author details and adding Positionality statements), switching to the specific ACM metadata standards (ORCID, CCS concepts), completing required documentation (datasheets/model cards), and adhering to complex publication timelines and rights requirements.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodological standards for empirical work in AI fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAccT). It advises researchers on matching specific claims (e.g., disparate harm) to appropriate evidence types—including disaggregated metrics, coded qualitative data, and documented ethical procedures. It stresses the importance of ethical review, handling protected attributes, and acknowledging limitations to ensure high scientific and ethical rigor.

A comprehensive guide for establishing academic rigor in AI and data science research. It outlines best practices for achieving reproducibility, emphasizing the mandatory release and documentation of raw data, trained models, and qualitative findings. Key tools include datasheets, model cards, and detailed provenance logging, ensuring that research claims are fully auditable and consistent.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting academic papers to the FAccT conference. It details critical, multi-step processes, including the mandatory abstract registration gate, maintaining mutual anonymity, adhering to strict ACM formatting rules, and including required endmatter statements (such as the Generative AI Usage Statement).

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate academic venue for their responsible AI work. It provides detailed criteria and rigorous testing methods (like the Delete-the-equity test) to assess whether fairness, accountability, or transparency is a primary, core contribution, guiding authors away from merely 'bolted-on' ethical framing.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting interdisciplinary, responsible AI papers to major academic conferences like FAccT. It provides a detailed backward-planning timeline, covering milestones from initial abstract registration and literature review to revisions, camera-ready submission, and conference presentation, emphasizing ethical considerations and structured academic processes.

This comprehensive guide helps authors navigate the complex decision of where to submit their Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) research. It outlines critical criteria, including the robot-embodiment and human-in-the-loop tests, to determine the correct venue (e.g., HRI, CHI, ICRA/IROS). Furthermore, it details the five specialized tracks within HRI and advises authors on matching their primary technical contribution to the most suitable academic domain.

This guide details the best practices for packaging, documenting, and releasing research artifacts (code, models, data) for top-tier ML conferences. It covers two stages: preparing a non-identifiable archive for anonymous review, and managing the public release runway, focusing on reproducibility, licensing, and sustained maintenance.

A comprehensive guide detailing the critical workflow from paper acceptance to final camera-ready submission for major computational conferences (like ICCV). It covers technical requirements such as de-anonymization, synchronizing multiple public copies (arXiv, CVF, IEEE), updating URLs, and managing logistical details for presentation.

A methodology guide for structuring high-stakes academic research experiments, particularly for top-tier CV conferences (like ICCV). It emphasizes systematic planning under strict deadlines, covering benchmark drift audits, ensuring fairness by accounting for pretraining confounds, structuring ablations to isolate mechanisms, and strategically sequencing runs to maximize impact before the submission deadline.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the "Related Work" section for top-tier computer vision conferences (ICCV, CVPR, ECCV). It covers best practices for citing intervening-cycle literature, managing concurrent preprints, ensuring double-blind anonymity, and correctly attributing source venues to maximize novelty perception and score highly with reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers detailing how to achieve and disclose full reproducibility for Computer Vision and deep learning models. Covers essential practices such as protocol pinning for foundation models, detailed logging of datasets, hardware specifications, and variance honesty, ensuring results remain verifiable years after publication.