Skill UI

This guide provides a framework for authors to strategically position their empirical research within the ongoing academic debates of Operations and Supply Chain Management (OM/SCM). It teaches authors to move beyond merely identifying knowledge gaps by problematizing shared assumptions, explicitly distinguishing empirical observation from analytical modeling, and aligning the contribution with the target department's specific mission.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit academic manuscripts to the Journal of Business Economics. It details the journal's specific scope, including business circulation, corporate management, and digital economy, and provides critical advice on structure, methodology, and academic framing. Use this tool to check manuscript suitability, revise arguments, identify common rejection pitfalls, and ensure adherence to the latest official submission standards.

This guide helps researchers determine if their manuscript is suitable for high-tier entrepreneurship journals like the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV). It provides specific criteria covering theoretical contribution, the centrality of the entrepreneurial process, methodological rigor (e.g., addressing selection bias), and adherence to journal house style, helping authors re-frame their work before submission.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the rigorous process of assessing whether a corporate finance manuscript is suitable for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) or related elite venues. It covers topic scope (governance, M&A, capital structure), methodological requirements (causal identification, endogeneity), structural best practices, and provides a detailed, step-by-step checklist for pre-submission self-review and alternative venue routing.

This comprehensive skill helps researchers determine if their academic paper, focusing on banking, liquidity, or financial intermediation, is suitable for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI). It guides authors on necessary theoretical contributions, rigorous empirical identification methods (e.g., DiD/IV/RDD), required paper structure, and adherence to the journal's highly specific submission standards and potential rejection triggers.

A comprehensive tool to assess the suitability of an economics, finance, or management manuscript for the Journal of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics. It covers journal scope, submission formatting, popular themes (e.g., Greater Bay Area, finance-law fusion), and common rejection risks, ensuring authors tailor their work to the venue's academic standards.

A specialized advisory tool designed for researchers submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It guides authors through required theoretical contributions, managerial relevance checks, methodology standards (empirical, analytical, design), and common submission pitfalls, ensuring the work meets the high academic standards of top-tier IS journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting JMCB, focusing on monetary economics, banking, and macro-finance. This skill helps assess if a manuscript meets the journal's standards regarding policy relevance, empirical rigor (e.g., identification strategies like SVAR/DiD), and structural framing. It guides authors on positioning their findings against current academic frontiers.

This comprehensive guide helps authors select and apply the appropriate EQUATOR reporting guideline (e.g., CONSORT for RCTs, PRISMA for systematic reviews) for various study designs. It mandates the inclusion of detailed, reconciled flow diagrams and fully mapped checklists, ensuring manuscripts meet the rigorous methodological standards of top-tier academic journals by preventing selective reporting and verifying data consistency across all sections.

This comprehensive guide outlines the mandatory replication and data policy for mathematical finance manuscripts. It provides authors with templates for Data Availability Statements (covering no data, code only, or public data) and details rigorous best practices for ensuring numerical exhibits are fully reproducible. It covers creating exhibit provenance ledgers and managing computational dependencies to maintain academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top Operations Management journals, such as M&SOM. It teaches how to translate complex analytical or empirical results into explicit, actionable operational contributions. The focus is on making the managerial implication, the core operational decision, and the structured abstract components clearly defined, moving the emphasis away from methodological novelty.

This guide instructs authors on how to strategically position their research manuscript within the established body of Operations Management (OM) literature. Instead of claiming an unstudied 'void,' the focus is on joining and advancing specific 'operational conversations' within canonical OM streams (e.g., queueing, supply chain, revenue management). It emphasizes differentiating contributions based on novel operational mechanisms or decision levers, ensuring the paper's fit is clear to expert reviewers and editors.