Skill UI

A comprehensive, multi-agent protocol simulating a professional board meeting. It executes a structured 6-phase deliberation—from isolated C-suite contributions and critical analysis to final founder review and decision extraction. Use this when making complex, high-stakes strategic decisions requiring rigorous multi-perspective vetting and actionable documentation.

Drafts self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback using WorkIQ evidence from emails, meetings, and contributions. It helps you write honest, impact-focused performance reviews in your own voice with STAR-based structure.

Provides a comprehensive framework for designing and implementing multi-touch attribution models across the entire marketing funnel. This guide helps assess data maturity, define credit distribution rules, set lookback windows, and tailor platform-specific configurations (GA4, HubSpot, CRM) to accurately measure true channel contribution and optimize marketing spend.

This guide acts as a specialized router for structuring academic manuscripts aiming for top-tier journals, such as 'Accounting Research'. It assesses the paper's fit, guides the sequence of methodological steps (e.g., measurement, identification, mechanism), and suggests addressing weaknesses like institutional context or empirical contributions. It helps users navigate the complex academic publishing journey from initial idea to final submission and rebuttal.

This detailed framework guides researchers in conducting rigorous and academically sound heterogeneity analysis for finance and economics manuscripts. It covers dimension prioritization, theoretical justification, sample size requirements, and statistical significance testing protocols (e.g., Chow test). Use this guide to strengthen the robustness of main findings and deepen the paper's contribution by identifying the specific conditions under which the effect operates.

This skill provides a comprehensive academic advisory guide for manuscripts targeting Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It helps authors re-frame their work, ensuring the focus is on advancing theoretical contributions rather than merely describing phenomena. Use this tool to check scope fit, methodological rigor, and structural requirements for top-tier entrepreneurship journals.

A comprehensive guide on structuring and drafting effective rebuttal letters for academic journal revisions (R&R), particularly for Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). Learn how to adopt a gracious, thorough, and responsive mindset, handle reviewer conflicts, re-secure theoretical contributions, and ensure every change is verifiable by quoting the new manuscript text.

This guide helps authors polish their academic prose for submission to Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It focuses on adjusting the narrative style to be theory-forward, highly accessible, and deeply grounded in concrete entrepreneurial realities. It provides specific structural advice for improving the introduction, transforming the abstract into a clear contribution statement, and strengthening the practice implications.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

This guide helps authors structure and articulate the novel, rigorous contribution of their work specifically for Information Systems Research (ISR) journals. It addresses the mandatory ~500-word contribution statement required in cover letters, ensuring the paper clearly advances an IS conversation, centers the IT artifact, and matches the required academic genre (insight, mechanism, or artifact).

This skill guides researchers on how to position their academic paper for top-tier journals in entrepreneurship. Instead of merely identifying 'gaps,' the focus is on joining an active scholarly conversation, problematizing established assumptions, and engaging with multiple disciplinary lenses (e.g., economics, psychology, sociology). It ensures the manuscript's contribution is clearly framed against the existing literature.

This skill guides researchers in refining their manuscript's core contribution for top academic journals like JCP. It teaches how to shift the narrative focus from simply reporting an 'effect' (X increases Y) to articulating the underlying psychological 'PROCESS' or 'mechanism' (X increases Y *because* it changes M). It ensures claims are theoretically surprising, scope-bound, and relevant to consumer behavior.