Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the rigorous multi-stage review process of *Acta Electronica Sinica* (AES). It covers the entire journey from initial submission and double-blind peer review to final acceptance, detailing decision points, interpreting manuscript statuses, understanding critical timelines (e.g., the 6-month red line), and providing strategic advice for revisions and resubmissions in electronics and information science.

A comprehensive checklist for the final preflight checks of the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) article. This guide ensures compliance with publisher requirements, covering disclosure statements, reference formatting, figure permissions, and critical transparency obligations for coverage accounts and meta-analyses. It serves as the last quality gate before final submission.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final, critical pre-submission review phase for high-impact scientific journals. It covers technical completeness, scientific rigor (e.g., statistics, cell line authentication), ethical compliance (e.g., IACUC/IRB), data availability, and formatting consistency, ensuring the manuscript is ready for final submission.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.

A comprehensive guide for preparing accepted conference papers for final publication (camera-ready). Details specific technical and procedural requirements for two distinct regimes: standalone ECAI (IOS Press FAIA) and joint IJCAI-ECAI. Covers de-anonymization, strict page budget adherence, template compliance (cls/sty), and mandatory submission forms to ensure publication quality.

This guide helps authors polish their academic prose for submission to Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It focuses on adjusting the narrative style to be theory-forward, highly accessible, and deeply grounded in concrete entrepreneurial realities. It provides specific structural advice for improving the introduction, transforming the abstract into a clear contribution statement, and strengthening the practice implications.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors targeting the journal 'Finance and Economics.' It details the journal's disciplinary scope (finance, regional, public finance), required manuscript structure, adherence to formatting rules (keywords, references), and common pitfalls to avoid. It acts as a pre-submission checklist to improve manuscript fit and increase acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous, multi-stage process required to transform an accepted conference submission into a publishable "camera-ready" manuscript for IEEE Xplore. It covers crucial steps including adhering to strict page limits (e.g., 8 pages), de-anonymizing content, ensuring metadata compliance via PaperPlaza, completing the IEEE electronic copyright transfer (eCF), and meeting registration requirements for final archival.

This specialized skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting the journal Industrial Economics Research. It covers the journal's positioning, preferred research topics (e.g., industrial organization, competition policy, digital transformation), required academic structure (introduction, literature review), and common pitfalls to avoid. It helps authors tailor their manuscripts to meet the high standards of CSSCI-level academic publishing.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

This guide helps authors structure and articulate the novel, rigorous contribution of their work specifically for Information Systems Research (ISR) journals. It addresses the mandatory ~500-word contribution statement required in cover letters, ensuring the paper clearly advances an IS conversation, centers the IT artifact, and matches the required academic genre (insight, mechanism, or artifact).

A comprehensive tool for sanity-checking research questions intended for Information Systems Research (ISR). It guides users to test the topic's fitness across four dimensions: IT-artifact centrality, sociotechnical framing, intradisciplinary potential, and level of analysis. It helps determine if the topic belongs in ISR or neighboring venues like MISQ or JMIS.