Skill UI

This detailed framework guides researchers in conducting rigorous and academically sound heterogeneity analysis for finance and economics manuscripts. It covers dimension prioritization, theoretical justification, sample size requirements, and statistical significance testing protocols (e.g., Chow test). Use this guide to strengthen the robustness of main findings and deepen the paper's contribution by identifying the specific conditions under which the effect operates.

This guide assists researchers in constructing robust theoretical arguments for entrepreneurship manuscripts, specifically focusing on the needs of ETP submissions. It details selecting core entrepreneurial mechanisms (e.g., effectuation, opportunity, bricolage), choosing appropriate theorizing modes (deductive, inductive), and ensuring the theory maintains a strong, specific link to actionable entrepreneurial practice.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for evaluating finance research topics before writing begins. It helps authors ensure the topic is general-interest, practically relevant to decision-makers (CFOs, investors, regulators), highly topical, and genuinely original. It ensures the work meets the standards of top general-interest finance journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to technical reviews and revising conference papers during a limited, combined rebuttal window. It teaches how to strategically triage objections, run decisive experiments, craft arguments for a program committee champion, and ensure minimal, faithful revisions to maximize acceptance chances.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

This guide helps authors structure and articulate the novel, rigorous contribution of their work specifically for Information Systems Research (ISR) journals. It addresses the mandatory ~500-word contribution statement required in cover letters, ensuring the paper clearly advances an IS conversation, centers the IT artifact, and matches the required academic genre (insight, mechanism, or artifact).

A comprehensive guide and checklist for authors preparing manuscripts for high-impact academic journals, specifically focusing on the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS). It covers critical steps such as double-anonymization, adherence to APA style, data and code availability statements, and structuring the separate title page, ensuring submission readiness before interacting with the publisher's portal.

This guide helps researchers refine and elevate preliminary marketing findings into high-impact, publishable questions suitable for JAMS. It teaches the rigorous standards required for a question to be broad, theoretically generative, and managerially consequential, ensuring proper positioning against competing academic journals.

A comprehensive skill for constructing robust theoretical arguments for entrepreneurial phenomena, specifically tailored for high-level academic journals. It guides the user in identifying the core causal mechanism, selecting the appropriate multidisciplinary lens (economics, psychology, or sociology), and choosing between deductive hypothesis testing or interpretive narrative theory. This ensures the theory is specific to the entrepreneurial context, avoiding generic organizational models.

This skill guides researchers in refining their manuscript's core contribution for top academic journals like JCP. It teaches how to shift the narrative focus from simply reporting an 'effect' (X increases Y) to articulating the underlying psychological 'PROCESS' or 'mechanism' (X increases Y *because* it changes M). It ensures claims are theoretically surprising, scope-bound, and relevant to consumer behavior.

This guide assists researchers in elevating a simple observed 'effect' into a theoretically robust and conceptually advanced research contribution suitable for the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR). It provides frameworks for assessing interdisciplinary relevance, distinguishing between behavioral and interpretive genres, and ensuring the question genuinely advances existing consumer theory.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the critical 'camera-ready' phase for academic publishing, specifically for JCRD. It ensures that all metadata, including author identities, institutional details, funding grants, and permanent links, are restored and verified. The guide covers adherence to formatting standards (e.g., GB/T 7714), precise revision limits during proofreading, and systematic de-anonymization to prevent publication errors.