Skill UI

This specialized skill is designed for creating investor pitch decks for various funding rounds (Seed, Series A/B/C). It builds upon standard presentation rules, adding critical VC-focused constraints such as stage-appropriate metrics, the canonical narrative arc (Problem -> Solution -> Market -> Ask), and finance-grade number conventions. Use this only when actively raising capital, not for general reviews.

A comprehensive guide to help researchers pressure-test if their project aligns with the scope of Population and Development Review (PDR). It teaches how to frame research by connecting demographic processes (e.g., fertility, aging) to broader social, economic, or environmental development issues, ensuring the contribution has broad policy interest beyond narrow estimation.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist for authors submitting research syntheses (such as meta-analyses or systematic reviews) to Psychological Bulletin via APA Editorial Manager. It guides authors through critical checks, including proper masking (anonymizing author identity), adherence to APA 7th edition standards, abstract length constraints (≤ 250 words), and mandatory completion of reporting frameworks like MARS or PRISMA.

A specialized tool designed to help academic researchers evaluate the suitability of their manuscripts for the 'Research and Development Management' journal. It analyzes the paper's fit, theoretical framing, structural requirements, and potential weaknesses against the journal's focus on enterprise-level innovation mechanisms, knowledge management, and academic rigor. It simulates the journal's editorial review process.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final steps before submitting academic manuscripts, especially for double-blind review processes. It covers critical requirements such as thorough anonymization (removing names, metadata, and self-citations), verifying file completeness (abstract, proofs, title page), managing submission fees, and confirming format compliance to ensure a smooth submission experience via Editorial Manager.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the rigorous editorial standards and submission protocols for the Review of Finance. It covers double-blind review requirements, the two-round decision philosophy, common desk screening patterns, and critical timing expectations (Regular vs. Fast-Track). This resource is essential for authors aiming to publish in top-tier finance journals by adhering strictly to academic integrity and compliance rules.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the mandatory submission process for the Review of Finance (RoF). It covers crucial details including fee structures (Regular vs. Fast-Track), manuscript length (60-page cap), abstract word limits, formatting standards, double-blind anonymity requirements, Chicago citation style, and necessary ethical disclosures. Use this guide before uploading to prevent desk rejection.

This command acts as a crucial product gate, forcing a deep, strategic review before any code is written. Instead of simply fulfilling the request, it guides users through three structured roles: Scope Expansion (finding the 10x vision), Hold Scope (stress-testing assumptions and failure modes), or Scope Reduction (defining the true MVP). It ensures that the developed solution solves the user's real job-to-be-done, not just the explicit feature request.