Skill UI

This foundational skill guides the establishment and maintenance of a comprehensive developer audience context. It helps map out detailed developer personas, identify core pain points, analyze current alternatives, and determine key technical differentiators. By structuring this context across 10 critical sections, it ensures all subsequent developer marketing materials are highly targeted and speak the exact language of the target user.

This skill guides the design, implementation, and auditing of inclusive digital products based on WCAG 2.2 standards. It covers the POUR principles and provides technical guidance for generating semantic ARIA (Web) and native accessibility traits (iOS/Android). Use it when defining UI components, auditing compliance gaps, or ensuring robust keyboard navigation and focus management.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final, critical pre-submission review phase for high-impact scientific journals. It covers technical completeness, scientific rigor (e.g., statistics, cell line authentication), ethical compliance (e.g., IACUC/IRB), data availability, and formatting consistency, ensuring the manuscript is ready for final submission.

This guide details the dual-track process after accepting a conference paper: the technical publication track (involving deanonymization, minor changes, and ACM production mechanics like TAPS and e-rights) and the conference presentation logistics. It serves as a comprehensive checklist for authors managing the transition from acceptance to final output.

A comprehensive guide for preparing accepted conference papers for final publication (camera-ready). Details specific technical and procedural requirements for two distinct regimes: standalone ECAI (IOS Press FAIA) and joint IJCAI-ECAI. Covers de-anonymization, strict page budget adherence, template compliance (cls/sty), and mandatory submission forms to ensure publication quality.

This comprehensive guide details the critical steps required before submitting a scholarly paper to Econometrics Journals (EctJ). It covers technical compliance, including adherence to specific LaTeX templates, managing page limits, optimizing summary word counts, correctly placing mathematical proofs, and addressing crucial administrative details like funding disclosure and submission fees. Use this checklist immediately prior to submission to ensure maximum readiness and minimize rejection risks.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to technical reviews and revising conference papers during a limited, combined rebuttal window. It teaches how to strategically triage objections, run decisive experiments, craft arguments for a program committee champion, and ensure minimal, faithful revisions to maximize acceptance chances.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

A comprehensive tool for sanity-checking research questions intended for Information Systems Research (ISR). It guides users to test the topic's fitness across four dimensions: IT-artifact centrality, sociotechnical framing, intradisciplinary potential, and level of analysis. It helps determine if the topic belongs in ISR or neighboring venues like MISQ or JMIS.

This comprehensive skill provides an essential, step-by-step preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) via Elsevier Editorial Manager. It covers critical, non-negotiable standards including length caps (40 pages, 10 tables/figures), abstract word count (≤100 words), required formatting (line numbers, author-date citations), mandatory declarations (AI, conflict of interest), and the required submission fee structure. Using this guide ensures your paper meets all journal-specific technical and structural requirements before final submiss...

Guides researchers in determining if their IS-related research question is suitable for the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It helps shift the focus from purely technical or CS contributions to the managerial, economic, and organizational value of technology, focusing on the technology–organization–economics nexus. Ideal for pre-writing selection and ensuring fit before deep theory work.

This guide helps researchers evaluate if their operations management (OM) paper is suitable for the Manufacturing and Service Operations Management (M&SOM) journal. It provides detailed criteria on scope, required operational insight, method rigor (analytical or empirical), and structural house style, ensuring the core contribution addresses practical operations problems rather than just technical methodology.