Skill UI

This skill guides the construction of robust, production-grade backtesting systems for financial trading strategies. It helps users systematically validate performance, avoid common biases (like look-ahead bias), and implement advanced techniques such as walk-forward analysis, ensuring reliable performance estimates before live deployment.

Provides a detailed, multi-platform workflow to monitor long-running computational experiments. It checks the status of jobs across various environments (SSH, vast.ai, Modal), collects screen logs, fetches structured JSON results, and pulls detailed training metrics (loss curves, accuracy) from Weights & Biases (W&B). Essential for MLOps and automated result review.

This skill performs a zero-context verification audit, ensuring that every quantitative claim, comparison, and scope statement within a research paper precisely matches the provided raw result files. It is designed to eliminate confirmation bias, catching discrepancies such as incorrect rounding, cherry-picked best seeds, or misreported performance deltas before publication. Ideal for validating paper-to-evidence fidelity.

A comprehensive, domain-agnostic 13-agent system designed for rigorous academic research on any topic. It guides users through the entire research lifecycle, supporting deep literature reviews, systematic meta-analysis, cross-source synthesis, bias assessment, and generating professional APA 7.0 reports. Ideal for academics, students, and analysts needing structured, deep insights.

This skill provides comprehensive intelligence across finance and media. Users can search real-time news, analyze media bias across multiple dimensions, get live stock/crypto data with AI forecasts, price financial options using ML models, and synthesize balanced perspectives on current events. It is ideal for deep research, investment analysis, and media literacy.

This guide provides a comprehensive, advanced strategy for academic researchers writing microeconometric papers for top-tier journals (e.g., AEJ: Applied). It teaches authors how to anticipate sophisticated, technical objections from expert referees (such as issues with causal inference design, selection bias, or parallel trends). The focus is on pre-empting these objections by integrating solutions directly into the manuscript text, rather than waiting for a formal revision letter.

A comprehensive framework designed to rigorously test the stability of key macroeconomic findings. This program addresses potential biases arising from specification choices, sample periods (e.g., Great Moderation, ZLB, COVID breaks), and methodological variations (SVAR vs. LP). It ensures that the reported headline quantity remains robust even when challenged by a skeptical academic referee, providing a targeted defense rather than simply listing extra tables. Ideal for high-stakes empirical macro papers.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for conducting rigorous statistical analysis and ensuring methodological validity for empirical manuscripts. It covers establishing measurement validity (CFA, reliability), selecting appropriate estimators (SEM, HLM, IV), addressing biases (CMB, endogeneity), and robust reporting of complex effects (mediation, moderation) required for top-tier academic journals.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological frameworks for designing rigorous empirical studies suitable for top-tier academic journals. It helps researchers match theoretical claims (e.g., causal effects, cross-level dynamics) to appropriate designs (experiments, panel data, qualitative analysis). It details how to proactively address major threats like Common-Method Bias, Endogeneity, and inconsistent levels of analysis, ensuring high internal and external validity.

This skill audits academic literature reviews (like Annual Reviews of Psychology) to ensure they maintain scholarly rigor, balance, and objectivity. It checks for uneven coverage across different labs or theories, ensures evidence is weighted by design strength and replication status (not mere vote-counting), and flags potential self-promotion or bias. Use this when scrutinizing a high-stakes scientific review for academic fairness.

A comprehensive guide for correcting bias in Difference-in-Differences (DID) analysis conducted with staggered adoption timing or heterogeneous treatment effects. This methodology replaces the biased Two-Way Fixed Effects (TWFE) approach with modern estimators such as Callaway–Sant'Anna, de Chaisemartin–D'Haultfœuille, and Sun–Abraham, ensuring compliance with advanced econometric standards.

This guide provides a comprehensive methodological framework and checklist for researchers conducting quasi-experimental and micro-panel studies in rural economics. It systematically addresses common econometric pitfalls, such as self-selection bias, reverse causality, and endogeneity, detailing best practices for advanced methods like Difference-in-Differences (DID), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity (RDD), and Propensity Score Matching (PSM).