Skill UI

A comprehensive skill designed for authors targeting the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). It provides an exhaustive checklist covering the journal's high academic standards, required evidence depth (such as Phase III randomized controlled trials), appropriate study scope (solid tumors, biomarkers), mandatory formatting, and the latest submission guidelines. Use this tool to optimize your manuscript and improve its suitability for publication in a top-tier oncology journal.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on submitting academic manuscripts to the Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics. It helps users determine if their work's scope, methodology, and narrative structure align with the journal's requirements. It covers everything from field preferences and formatting rules (e.g., double-blind review) to common rejection pitfalls, minimizing the risk of inappropriate submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors on creating APA 7th edition compliant tables and figures for scientific manuscripts, specifically tailored for the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP). This resource emphasizes best practices for presenting multi-study data, including self-contained exhibits, cross-study summary tables, and internal meta-analysis forest plots, ensuring the findings are clear and impactful.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to Management Science (INFORMS). It systematically verifies adherence to crucial publishing standards, including double-anonymization, author-year formatting, abstract length constraints, fee/waiver eligibility, and the mandatory Code and Data Disclosure package using an AsCollected URL. Use this guide right before final submission to ensure maximum readiness.

A comprehensive pre-deadline audit checklist for submitting papers to the MLSys conference. It guides authors through track-specific requirements (Research vs. Industrial), formatting compliance (10-page limit, two-column layout), maintaining double-blind anonymity, and correctly handling appendices and citations to ensure readiness before the submission deadline.

This skill is a comprehensive fit and re-framing tool for authors targeting the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS). It helps manuscripts determine if their scope, methodological rigor, structure, and presentation meet the standards of this major archival journal in astronomy and astrophysics. It covers everything from observational techniques and simulations to required LaTeX formatting and common desk-reject pitfalls.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for formatting tables and figures for high-level academic journals. It details rigorous requirements, such as adhering to the three-line table format (booktabs), limiting columns, correctly placing standard errors, and ensuring figures meet minimum DPI and color constraints. Use this when transforming raw statistical outputs into publication-ready, professional content.

This skill automates the creation of professional, multi-element Excel dashboards from raw CSV or tabular data. It structures the output with a dedicated 'Dashboard sheet' that serves as the primary landing view. Features include formula-driven KPI cards, linked charts, sparklines, and semantic conditional formatting. It is ideal for generating executive, analytics, or performance dashboards, ensuring that the user sees immediate, actionable insights without needing to navigate raw data sheets.

A comprehensive guide and heuristic tool for assessing whether an academic manuscript is suitable for high-level public administration and policy journals, specifically referencing Public Administration and Policy Review. It details required scope, suitable methodologies (e.g., policy evaluation, case studies, mixed methods), structural requirements (anonymity, abstract formatting), and common rejection pitfalls to guide authors toward rigorous academic writing.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for creating publication-grade, self-contained tables and figures for top finance journals, such as The Review of Financial Studies (RFS). It covers best practices for rigorous statistical reporting, emphasizing standard error reporting, economic magnitude, and ensuring that all presented results are fully reproducible from the source code.

This guide assists researchers in evaluating the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Scientific Decision Making. It covers journal scope, required methodologies (e.g., system modeling, policy evaluation), structural improvements, common formatting pitfalls (footnotes, Arabic numerals), and cross-journal selection criteria to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for authors preparing papers for the SIGMOD conference. It covers critical rules such as double-anonymous formatting, ACM template compliance, abstract-plus-COI pre-deadlines, and avoiding common desk-reject hazards. Use this guide to ensure your submission meets the rigorous technical and ethical standards required for top-tier data management publications.