Skill UI

Structured manuscript and grant review guidance that walks reviewers through methodology, statistics, reporting compliance, and constructive feedback for rigorous scientific evaluation across disciplines.

This skill searches for published academic papers from major venues like IEEE, ACM, and Springer via the Semantic Scholar API. It is ideal for finding peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings, providing crucial metadata such as citation counts, venue details, and TLDR summaries. Use it when you need verified, published literature beyond raw arXiv preprints.

A systematic framework designed for conducting rigorous peer reviews of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals. It provides a structured, checklist-based evaluation covering methodology rigor, statistical validity, reporting compliance (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and assesses all sections from abstract to results. Ideal for academic publishing, research quality assessment, and providing detailed, constructive feedback.

This skill provides a systematic framework for evaluating the rigor of scientific claims, research methodology, and evidence quality. It guides users through assessing experimental design validity, identifying various types of biases (e.g., selection, cognitive), and applying established grading frameworks like GRADE or Cochrane Risk of Bias. Ideal for systematic reviews, peer review, and critical analysis of scientific literature.